XLV vs IHI Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR) provides broad S&P 500 healthcare exposure across pharma, biotech, managed care, and devices at ultra-low cost, while IHI (iShares US Medical Devices) concentrates purely in medical device companies at higher cost. XLV is the standard broad healthcare allocation tool; IHI is a subsector bet on medical technology innovation and aging demographics driving surgical procedure demand.
XLV vs IHI is broad healthcare sector diversification (all S&P 500 healthcare subsectors at 0.09%) versus medical device subsector concentration (pure-play devices, robotics, and diagnostics at 0.40%) — the tradeoff between comprehensive healthcare coverage and targeted medical technology exposure.
XLV holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. XLV has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+14.13% vs -18.18% for IHI).
- →Want comprehensive healthcare sector exposure at ultra-low cost (0.09%) — pharmaceuticals, biotech, managed care, medical devices, and healthcare technology in one ETF
- →Value healthcare's defensive characteristics during economic slowdowns — healthcare spending is relatively inelastic and XLV provides broad sector diversification without overweighting any single healthcare subsector
- →Use XLV as a sector rotation tool or to overweight defensive sectors during market uncertainty without taking subsector concentration risk
- →Want pure-play medical device and equipment exposure — concentrated in companies like Intuitive Surgical, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific that benefit from aging demographics and surgical technology innovation
- →Value the aging population tailwind for elective procedures, cardiac devices, orthopedic implants, and diabetes monitoring devices that is more directly expressed in IHI than in broad XLV
- →Accept the higher expense ratio (0.40%) and subsector concentration risk in exchange for more targeted medical technology exposure without managed care or pharmaceutical company weights
| Metric | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 58.0 | 14.0 |
| Latest close | $149.40 | $49.07 |
| 1M return | +1.41% | -2.26% |
| 6M return | -2.04% | -21.04% |
| 1Y return | +14.13% | -18.18% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.62K (+16.2%) started 2025-06-18 | $8.22K (-17.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $14.22K (+42.2%) started 2021-06-18 | $8.78K (-12.2%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $29.77K (+197.7%) started 2016-06-20 | $24.1K (+141.0%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.38% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $38.25B | $2.99B |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.45% |
| Trailing P/E | 24.10 | 30.25 |
| Beta | 0.58 | 0.82 |
| 52-week change | 14.13% | -18.18% |
| Metric | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +14.13% | -18.18% |
| 6M return | -2.04% | -21.04% |
| 1M return | +1.41% | -2.26% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | -1.32 |
| Beta | 0.58 | 0.82 |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.45% |
| 5Y CAGR | +5.53% | -3.01% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +14.13% | -18.18% |
| CAGR | +14.14% | -18.19% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.66 | -1.32 | |
| Max drawdown | 10.47% | 26.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 2.80% | 3.25% | |
| Max wkly drop | 4.68% | 5.71% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +30.86% | -14.15% |
| CAGR | +5.53% | -3.01% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.13 | -0.30 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.11% | 33.12% | |
| Max daily drop | 5.48% | 6.38% | |
| Max wkly drop | 8.36% | 10.41% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +149.43% | +131.14% |
| CAGR | +9.58% | +8.75% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.36 | 0.30 | |
| Max drawdown | 28.40% | 33.25% | |
| Max daily drop | 9.86% | 10.57% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.20% | 13.64% |
| Category | XLV | IHI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.38% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $38.25B | $2.99B |
| Dividend yield | 1.68% | 0.45% |
- →Comprehensive healthcare sector coverage — XLV provides one-stop exposure to pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, medical devices, healthcare services, and managed care in a single low-cost ETF
- →Ultra-low expense ratio (0.09%) from State Street makes XLV one of the cheapest sector ETFs available
- →Healthcare's defensive characteristics — drug and insurance demand is relatively inelastic to economic cycles, making XLV a common defensive allocation in equity portfolios
- →Pure-play medical device exposure — IHI concentrates in the segment of healthcare most tied to surgical volume recovery post-COVID, elective procedure demand, and innovative device adoption (robotic surgery, minimally invasive)
- →Aging demographics are a powerful structural tailwind — orthopedic implants, cardiac devices, diabetes management, and diagnostic imaging demand grows with an aging population
- →Technology innovation within devices — Intuitive Surgical's robotic surgery, continuous glucose monitors (Abbott FreeStyle Libre), and structural heart devices represent high-growth subsegments within IHI
- →Pharmaceutical and managed care concentration — top holdings in UnitedHealth, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and AbbVie often represent 40%+ of XLV, concentrating exposure in a few companies
- →Drug pricing political risk affects the entire healthcare sector — any legislative action on pharmaceutical pricing, Medicare negotiation, or healthcare reform can impact XLV broadly
- →Large managed care components (UnitedHealth, Humana, CVS) behave differently from pharma and biotech — XLV's sector blend means subsector dynamics are mixed
- →Higher expense ratio (0.40%) versus XLV's 0.09% — investors pay more for IHI's subsector concentration
- →Subsector volatility — IHI can be more volatile than broad XLV as it lacks the defensive buffer of managed care and pharmaceuticals during device-specific headwinds
- →Hospital procedure volume sensitivity — IHI companies rely on hospitals performing elective surgeries; COVID-era procedure deferrals significantly impacted medical device revenue in 2020
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.