FBTC vs IBIT ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
FBTC and IBIT are the two highest-quality spot Bitcoin ETFs — both at 0.25% expense ratio, both with $10B+ AUM, and both backed by leading financial institutions. The primary differentiators are custody model (Fidelity self-custody vs Coinbase for IBIT) and ecosystem (Fidelity retail clients prefer FBTC; institutional advisors prefer IBIT). Performance will be essentially identical. The choice is driven by where you hold your accounts.
FBTC vs IBIT — Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (Fidelity's self-custodied spot Bitcoin ETF with massive retail distribution through Fidelity's brokerage and retirement platforms at 0.25%) versus iShares Bitcoin Trust (BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF with Coinbase custody that became the world's largest Bitcoin fund via institutional advisor adoption at 0.25%).
FBTC and IBIT are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. FBTC has delivered stronger 1-year price return (-39.57% vs -39.60% for IBIT).
- →hold accounts at Fidelity brokerage or Fidelity 401k plans where FBTC is the natural Bitcoin ETF integration — commission-free trading and seamless portfolio integration within the Fidelity platform
- →prefer Fidelity's self-custody model for Bitcoin — Fidelity Digital Assets holding Bitcoin internally avoids Coinbase counterparty dependency for investors with strong views on custody counterparties
- →are Fidelity retail clients who use Fidelity's research, portfolio planning, and automatic investment tools that feature FBTC in their Bitcoin allocation recommendations
- →want the institutional credibility of a Fidelity-branded Bitcoin fund with identical 0.25% cost to IBIT — Fidelity's $10T+ AUM firm backing FBTC provides comparable institutional assurance to BlackRock/IBIT
- →invest through financial advisors and RIAs who have standardized on IBIT as the Bitcoin allocation vehicle in institutional model portfolios — BlackRock's advisor channel distribution makes IBIT the de facto institutional Bitcoin ETF
- →need maximum Bitcoin ETF liquidity for large institutional positions where IBIT's $30B+ AUM and highest daily volume create the most liquid options market for hedging
- →prefer BlackRock's Coinbase custody pairing as the recognized institutional Bitcoin custody standard — Coinbase's regulated Prime Trust custodian is more familiar to institutional compliance teams
- →are investing through non-Fidelity brokerages where IBIT's iShares branding and BlackRock relationships ensure the best institutional support and research access
| Metric | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 41.0 | 52.0 |
| Latest close | $54.77 | $35.62 |
| 1M return | -18.03% | -18.11% |
| 6M return | -26.83% | -26.87% |
| 1Y return | -39.57% | -39.60% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.04K (-39.6%) started 2025-06-18 | $6.04K (-39.6%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $13.4K (+34.0%) started 2024-01-11 | $13.38K (+33.8%) started 2024-01-11 |
| 10Y ago | $13.4K (+34.0%) started 2024-01-11 | $13.38K (+33.8%) started 2024-01-11 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $13.4B | $58.12B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | N/A | 1.71 |
| 52-week change | -39.57% | -39.60% |
| Metric | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | -39.57% | -39.60% |
| 6M return | -26.83% | -26.87% |
| 1M return | -18.03% | -18.11% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | -1.03 | -1.03 |
| Beta | N/A | 1.71 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 5Y CAGR | +12.77% | +12.69% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -39.57% | -39.60% |
| CAGR | -39.59% | -39.62% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.03 | -1.03 | |
| Max drawdown | 52.07% | 52.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.22% | 13.16% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.20% | 24.16% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +33.98% | +33.76% |
| CAGR | +12.77% | +12.69% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | |
| Max drawdown | 52.07% | 52.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 14.41% | 14.41% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.20% | 24.16% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +33.98% | +33.76% |
| CAGR | +12.77% | +12.69% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | |
| Max drawdown | 52.07% | 52.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 14.41% | 14.41% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.20% | 24.16% |
| Category | FBTC | IBIT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $13.4B | $58.12B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
- →Fidelity self-custody of Bitcoin: Fidelity Digital Assets manages Bitcoin custody internally — investors who prefer not having Coinbase as counterparty risk can hold Bitcoin exposure through Fidelity's proprietary custody infrastructure
- →Fidelity retail distribution advantage: Fidelity's tens of millions of retail and retirement accounts create massive natural distribution for FBTC — the fund is featured prominently in Fidelity's investment recommendations
- →0.25% expense ratio matching IBIT: FBTC offers identical cost to IBIT — the Bitcoin ETF expense war has converged to a near-commodity 0.25% among top-tier funds
- →World's largest Bitcoin fund at $30B+: IBIT's dominant AUM creates unmatched Bitcoin ETF liquidity — most liquid options market among Bitcoin ETFs for institutional hedging
- →BlackRock + Coinbase custody pairing: the combination of BlackRock management and Coinbase's regulated crypto custody provides the most recognizable institutional counterparty combination in Bitcoin ETFs
- →Financial advisor adoption: BlackRock's relationships with RIAs and wirehouse advisors have driven IBIT into advisor model portfolios — financial advisor channel provides IBIT with structural distribution advantage vs FBTC
- →Lower AUM than IBIT limits some institutional liquidity: FBTC has $15B+ vs IBIT's $30B+ — IBIT's deeper market depth marginally reduces bid-ask spreads for very large institutional Bitcoin trades
- →Fidelity custody introduces counterparty concentration: using Fidelity Digital Assets for custody creates counterparty concentration with a single institution vs IBIT's Coinbase-external custody separation
- →Both track Bitcoin price identically: FBTC and IBIT will perform essentially identically before costs — expense ratio and custody are the only meaningful differentiation factors
- →Coinbase single-custodian concentration: IBIT's reliance on Coinbase for Bitcoin custody creates counterparty risk if Coinbase faced regulatory or operational issues
- →Same 0.25% expense as FBTC: IBIT has no fee advantage over FBTC — the two are near-equivalent in cost for the individual investor
- →Bitcoin volatility is the primary risk: IBIT's institutional backing doesn't reduce Bitcoin's inherent 50-80% bear market drawdown potential — the asset itself is the dominant risk factor
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.