brimindinvest.com / compare / nusi-vs-jepiLIVE
NUSI
Nationwide Risk-Managed Income ETF · ETF / Risk-Managed Income
$55.46
+0.39% this month
VERSUS
COMPARE
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF · ETF / Equity Premium Income
$56.10
+0.73% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
NUSI
2
JEPI
3
JEPI LEADS 3/5
Comparison scoreboard
JEPI LEADS 3/5
Exp. Ratio
NUSI 0.68%
JEPI 0.35%
1Y Return
NUSI +17.03%
JEPI +9.04%
Div. Yield
NUSI 7.61%
JEPI 8.45%
AUM
NUSI $323.76M
JEPI $44.59B
Beta
NUSI 0.11
JEPI 0.55
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take

NUSI vs JEPI Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

NUSI and JEPI both generate options-enhanced income but manage downside risk differently. NUSI explicitly purchases downside protection (put options) at the cost of some income, while JEPI achieves downside mitigation through defensive stock selection without explicit puts. NUSI suits risk-averse investors who want a structural floor; JEPI suits investors comfortable with defensive equity risk mitigation seeking maximum income.

NUSI vs JEPI — Nationwide Risk-Managed Income ETF (Nasdaq-100 collar strategy with explicit put protection and 6-8% monthly income with defined downside floor) versus JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (defensive S&P 500 stocks with ELN call overlay generating 7-9% monthly income with implicit defensive downside mitigation).

Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026

JEPI holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. NUSI has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+17.03% vs +9.04% for JEPI).

Normalized 1Y performance
NUSI
JEPI
Recent returns
NUSI
JEPI
Who should consider this stock?
NUSI may suit investors who:
  • want explicit structural downside protection — the purchased put options provide a defined floor that JEPI's defensive equity selection doesn't guarantee
  • are comfortable with lower income (6-8%) in exchange for Nasdaq-100 quality exposure with explicit downside buffering in severe market declines
  • prefer Nasdaq-100 technology growth companies as underlying equity vs JEPI's defensive utilities, healthcare, and consumer staples tilt
  • value defined risk parameters — knowing both maximum upside and maximum downside from the collar structure provides risk management clarity
JEPI may suit investors who:
  • prioritize maximum current income — JEPI's 7-9% yield exceeds NUSI's 6-8% because no put premium is consumed for protection
  • accept defensive equity selection (utilities, healthcare, staples) as adequate downside mitigation without paying for explicit put option floors
  • prefer simpler structure without trying to predict collar effectiveness in different market regimes
  • value JEPI's lower 0.35% expense ratio and JPMorgan institutional options expertise for efficient income generation
Performance & AI score
MetricNUSIJEPI
ETF score46.058.0
Latest close$55.46$56.10
1M return+0.39%+0.73%
6M return+5.42%+2.15%
1Y return+17.03%+9.04%
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)

How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?

PeriodNUSIJEPI
1Y ago$12.87K (+28.7%)
started 2025-06-12
$11.85K (+18.5%)
started 2025-06-18
5Y ago$112.75K (+1027.5%)
started 2021-06-14
$24.71K (+147.1%)
started 2021-06-18
10Y ago$264.34K (+2543.4%)
started 2019-12-19
$36.97K (+269.7%)
started 2020-05-21

Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fund characteristics
MetricNUSIJEPI
Expense ratio0.68%0.35%
Total assets (AUM)$323.76M$44.59B
Dividend yield7.61%8.45%
Trailing P/E17.3127.49
Beta0.110.55
52-week change17.03%9.04%
Risk & fund metrics
MetricNUSIJEPI
1Y return+17.03%+9.04%
6M return+5.42%+2.15%
1M return+0.39%+0.73%
1Y Sharpe ratio1.150.56
Beta0.110.55
Dividend yield7.61%8.45%
5Y CAGR+32.58%+7.73%
Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot
NUSI max drawdown6.96%
JEPI max drawdown6.68%
NUSI max wkly drop3.98%
JEPI max wkly drop2.46%
5Y risk snapshot
NUSI max drawdown26.92%
JEPI max drawdown13.71%
NUSI max wkly drop9.19%
JEPI max wkly drop9.92%
10Y risk snapshot
NUSI max drawdown26.92%
JEPI max drawdown13.71%
NUSI max wkly drop9.19%
JEPI max wkly drop9.92%
Performance metrics by period
PeriodMetricNUSIJEPI
1YGrowth+17.03%+9.04%
CAGR+17.04%+9.05%
Sharpe ratio1.150.56
Max drawdown6.96%6.68%
Max daily drop2.74%1.61%
Max wkly drop3.98%2.46%
5YGrowth+308.94%+45.10%
CAGR+32.58%+7.73%
Sharpe ratio0.660.32
Max drawdown26.92%13.71%
Max daily drop4.14%5.56%
Max wkly drop9.19%9.92%
10YGrowth+466.44%+88.50%
CAGR+30.68%+11.00%
Sharpe ratio0.670.61
Max drawdown26.92%13.71%
Max daily drop4.75%5.56%
Max wkly drop9.19%9.92%
Fund overview
CategoryNUSIJEPI
Fund nameNEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETFJPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
TypeETFETF
Expense ratio0.68%0.35%
Total assets (AUM)$323.76M$44.59B
Dividend yield7.61%8.45%
NUSI strengths
  • Explicit downside protection via purchased put options: NUSI's collar strategy buys put options that limit Nasdaq-100 losses beyond a specific threshold — a feature no pure covered call ETF provides
  • High-quality Nasdaq-100 underlying: NUSI's tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 equity exposure means quality growth companies (Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta) underlie the income strategy
  • Monthly income with defined risk parameters: NUSI provides monthly distributions while defining both maximum upside and maximum downside — predictable risk/return profile
JEPI strengths
  • Higher income (7-9%) vs NUSI because no put option premium cost: JEPI doesn't buy downside protection — keeping more option income for distributions
  • Broader 100+ stock defensive diversification: JEPI's defensive equity selection across S&P 500 provides market risk reduction without the explicit cost of put options
  • Lower expense ratio (0.35%) vs NUSI's higher cost structure: JEPI's institutional ELN efficiency at lower fees vs NUSI's collar premium costs
Risks to watch — NUSI
  • Higher cost structure: buying put options for downside protection reduces net income vs pure covered call strategies — NUSI's yield is lower than pure income ETFs because some premium pays for put protection
  • Limited upside capped by sold calls: in strong Nasdaq-100 bull markets, NUSI's sold calls cap appreciation — both upside and downside are bounded
  • Complex collar mechanics may not always provide intended protection: collar strikes reset monthly — protection level varies based on option pricing environment, and severe crashes may occur between reset periods
Risks to watch — JEPI
  • No explicit floor protection: JEPI's defensive tilt reduces but doesn't eliminate downside — in severe equity crashes, JEPI falls meaningfully (though less than S&P 500)
  • S&P 500 exposure vs Nasdaq-100: JEPI's S&P 500 defensive approach has less technology growth potential than NUSI's Nasdaq-100 underlying
  • ELN counterparty exposure to JPMorgan: complex financial instrument adds institutional dependency vs NUSI's more straightforward listed option collar
Frequently asked questions
A collar strategy simultaneously sells an out-of-the-money call option (capping upside) and uses the premium received to buy an out-of-the-money put option (protecting against downside). For NUSI on the Nasdaq-100: if the Nasdaq is at 18,000, NUSI might sell a 19,000 call (2,000 point cap above) and buy a 16,500 put (protection below). The sold call premium funds the put purchase. Between 16,500 and 19,000, NUSI participates fully in Nasdaq-100 movements. Above 19,000, gains are capped. Below 16,500, losses are capped. The cost of the put reduces available income distributions vs pure covered call strategies.
AI Prediction SignalNext 5 trading days
Members only
NUSI
+2.8%BUY
JEPI
+1.1%HOLD

Sign up to unlock AI price predictions

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required
Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →