SPDW vs VEA ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SPDW and VEA are nearly identical in purpose and characteristics — both are ultra-low-cost international developed market equity ETFs providing broad exposure to European, Japanese, and Asia-Pacific developed market stocks. The differences are primarily the index provider (S&P for SPDW vs. FTSE for VEA), Vanguard's larger AUM and higher brand recognition for VEA, and minor country classification differences. Both are excellent core international equity ETFs; the choice often comes down to existing portfolio structure and brokerage preferences.
SPDW vs VEA is a low-cost international developed market equity comparison where differences are minimal — State Street's SPDW (S&P Developed ex-US BMI Index, ultra-low cost, SPDR Portfolio brand) versus Vanguard's VEA (FTSE Developed All Cap ex-US Index, world's largest AUM in international equities, Vanguard's brand) — both excellent, nearly interchangeable core international equity building blocks with the primary differentiator being cost and index provider preference.
SPDW and VEA are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. VEA has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+34.18% vs +34.02% for SPDW).
- →Already use State Street/SPDR ETFs and prefer maintaining a consistent SPDR Portfolio ETF family for simplicity — SPDW pairs naturally with SPFB (U.S. bonds), SPEM (EM equities), and SPLG (U.S. equities)
- →Trade on platforms with preferential commission-free SPDW access or where SPDW has a specific advantage over VEA in terms of platform integration or ETF model portfolio support
- →Value the S&P developed market index methodology's specific country and company selection criteria over the FTSE methodology
- →Use Vanguard accounts or Vanguard's Total International ETF approach, where VEA pairs naturally with VXUS (total international) or is the developed market allocation within a three-fund portfolio (VTI + VEA + BND)
- →Value VEA's world-class liquidity and enormous AUM as providing maximum trading efficiency for both small and large investment amounts
- →Already use Vanguard equity ETFs (VTI, VOO) and want to maintain a consistent Vanguard portfolio structure for simplicity and consistent expense ratio minimization
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 91.0 | 94.0 |
| Latest close | $51.83 | $72.31 |
| 1M return | +5.58% | +5.36% |
| 6M return | +19.30% | +19.39% |
| 1Y return | +34.02% | +34.18% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $13.88K (+38.8%) started 2025-06-18 | $13.92K (+39.2%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $19.35K (+93.5%) started 2021-06-18 | $19.7K (+97.0%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $36.74K (+267.4%) started 2016-06-20 | $38.12K (+281.2%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $40.94B | $317.3B |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 2.61% |
| Trailing P/E | 18.89 | 18.64 |
| Beta | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| 52-week change | 34.02% | 34.18% |
| Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +34.02% | +34.18% |
| 6M return | +19.30% | +19.39% |
| 1M return | +5.58% | +5.36% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Beta | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 2.61% |
| 5Y CAGR | +10.35% | +10.55% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +34.02% | +34.18% |
| CAGR | +34.04% | +34.21% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | |
| Max drawdown | 11.55% | 11.63% | |
| Max daily drop | 3.71% | 3.72% | |
| Max wkly drop | 6.96% | 7.06% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +63.65% | +65.12% |
| CAGR | +10.35% | +10.55% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.41 | 0.42 | |
| Max drawdown | 30.21% | 29.71% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.34% | 6.33% | |
| Max wkly drop | 10.59% | 10.51% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +169.11% | +170.47% |
| CAGR | +10.41% | +10.47% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | |
| Max drawdown | 34.98% | 35.74% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.19% | 11.18% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.69% | 20.94% |
| Category | SPDW | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF | Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $40.94B | $317.3B |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 2.61% |
- →Ultra-low expense ratio makes SPDW one of the lowest-cost international ETFs available — SPDW's expense ratio is among the lowest for broad international ETFs; the SPDR Portfolio ETFs series was specifically designed to compete with Vanguard on cost
- →S&P Developed ex-US BMI Index includes South Korea and Canada — the S&P index includes Canada and South Korea, which some other developed market indices (notably FTSE used by VEA) may classify differently, providing slightly different country exposure
- →Broad inclusion of small-cap developed market stocks — SPDW's index includes small-cap international stocks in addition to large and mid-cap; small-cap international stocks have historically provided a valuation premium versus large-cap international equities
- →World-class liquidity as one of the largest international equity ETFs — VEA's enormous AUM (one of the top 10 largest ETFs globally) means institutional and retail investors can trade VEA with minimal market impact; tight spreads make VEA extremely cost-efficient to trade
- →Vanguard's cost minimization ethos and mutual ownership structure — Vanguard is owned by its funds; the company's objective is minimizing costs for investors rather than maximizing profits for shareholders; VEA's expense ratio has been reduced multiple times
- →FTSE index includes South Korea — FTSE classifies South Korea as developed market, so VEA includes Samsung, SK Hynix, and other Korean companies; investors who want Korean tech exposure within their developed market allocation benefit from this classification
- →Currency risk from non-USD developed market holdings — SPDW's returns in USD are affected by the exchange rates of the euro, yen, pound, Canadian dollar, and other currencies; a rising USD reduces SPDW's USD returns even if underlying international stock prices rise in local currency
- →International developed markets underperformance vs U.S. equities has been persistent — over the past decade, international developed market equities significantly underperformed U.S. equities; this was driven by U.S. technology sector dominance, stronger U.S. economic growth, and USD strength
- →Japan and Europe economic challenges — Japan (historically approximately 20% of SPDW) faces structural economic challenges (demographic decline, corporate governance historically poor); European economies (approximately 45% of SPDW) face energy cost challenges, slower technology sector development, and cyclical vulnerabilities
- →Same currency, geopolitical, and international underperformance risks as SPDW — VEA and SPDW face identical macro risks: USD appreciation, European economic challenges, Japanese demographic headwinds, and continued U.S. equity outperformance
- →FTSE versus MSCI methodology creates slight differences from iShares EFA (which uses MSCI) — investors combining VEA with MSCI-based ETFs should be aware of potential country weighting differences (South Korea in FTSE developed vs. MSCI emerging)
- →Technology sector underweight versus U.S. equities — developed international markets have lower technology sector weights than U.S. indices; VEA's top sectors are industrials, financials, and healthcare rather than technology; this has contributed to underperformance during U.S. tech bull markets
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.