VNQI vs REET ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
VNQI and REET both provide global REIT exposure but with different scopes — VNQI (Vanguard) excludes U.S. REITs entirely, providing pure non-U.S. real estate exposure for investors who already have domestic REIT exposure through VNQ, while REET (iShares) is a single global REIT fund combining approximately 60-65% U.S. REITs with 35-40% international REITs. The choice depends on whether investors want a one-stop global REIT fund (REET) or want to build separate domestic and international REIT allocations (VNQ + VNQI).
VNQI vs REET is pure international REIT exposure for investors building separate domestic and global real estate allocations (Vanguard's VNQI holding Japanese, Australian, UK, Singapore, and European REITs exclusively without any U.S. REIT overlap) versus all-in-one global REIT fund including both U.S. and international REITs in one fund (iShares REET with approximately 60% U.S. REIT and 40% international REIT reflecting global market capitalization weights) — standalone international building block versus total global REIT solution.
VNQI holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. REET has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+13.24% vs +4.50% for VNQI).
- →Already hold U.S. REIT exposure through VNQ, Vanguard's Target Retirement funds, or individual U.S. REIT stocks and want to add international real estate without double-counting domestic REIT exposure
- →Want control over their U.S. versus international REIT allocation percentage — pairing VNQI with VNQ at a custom ratio (e.g., 70% VNQ / 30% VNQI) provides precise geographic allocation control
- →Value Vanguard's ultra-low expense ratio in the international REIT category
- →Prefer a single global REIT ETF that handles the U.S./international split automatically — REET's global market-cap weighting reflects the relative size of real estate capital markets without requiring manual allocation decisions
- →Are starting their real estate ETF allocation from scratch and want comprehensive global coverage in one fund before deciding whether to add more targeted exposures
- →Value iShares/BlackRock's REIT expertise and the FTSE EPRA Nareit benchmark that is the global REIT industry standard
| Metric | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 36.0 | 44.0 |
| Latest close | $44.84 | $27.06 |
| 1M return | -1.65% | +0.86% |
| 6M return | -0.61% | +10.47% |
| 1Y return | +4.50% | +13.24% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $10.95K (+9.5%) started 2025-06-18 | $11.74K (+17.4%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $11.74K (+17.4%) started 2021-06-18 | $13.63K (+36.3%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $20.73K (+107.3%) started 2016-06-20 | $24.05K (+140.5%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.12% | 0.14% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $3.8B | $4.77B |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 3.37% |
| Trailing P/E | 12.44 | 22.26 |
| Beta | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| 52-week change | 4.50% | 13.24% |
| Metric | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +4.50% | +13.24% |
| 6M return | -0.61% | +10.47% |
| 1M return | -1.65% | +0.86% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.06 | 0.70 |
| Beta | 0.73 | 0.95 |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 3.37% |
| 5Y CAGR | -1.22% | +2.79% |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +4.50% | +13.24% |
| CAGR | +4.50% | +13.25% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.06 | 0.70 | |
| Max drawdown | 14.78% | 9.04% | |
| Max daily drop | 2.85% | 3.07% | |
| Max wkly drop | 6.09% | 4.24% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -5.94% | +14.76% |
| CAGR | -1.22% | +2.79% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.29 | -0.02 | |
| Max drawdown | 34.92% | 32.11% | |
| Max daily drop | 4.50% | 4.60% | |
| Max wkly drop | 9.43% | 11.12% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +25.68% | +48.50% |
| CAGR | +2.31% | +4.04% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.06 | 0.07 | |
| Max drawdown | 38.35% | 44.59% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.78% | 16.66% | |
| Max wkly drop | 25.89% | 28.83% |
| Category | VNQI | REET |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Index Fund ETF Shares | iShares Global REIT ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.12% | 0.14% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $3.8B | $4.77B |
| Dividend yield | 4.67% | 3.37% |
- →Pure international REIT focus provides clean non-U.S. real estate diversification — VNQI excludes U.S. REITs entirely, allowing investors to pair it with VNQ (Vanguard U.S. REIT ETF) for customized domestic vs. international real estate allocation
- →Low-cost access to global real estate markets otherwise difficult to access directly — Japanese REITs (J-REITs), Australian REITs (A-REITs), and Singapore REITs (S-REITs) are liquid real estate markets that VNQI makes easily accessible for U.S. investors
- →Vanguard expense ratio minimization philosophy — VNQI's expense ratio benefits from Vanguard's ongoing cost reduction; international REIT ETFs historically had higher fees until Vanguard pushed the market lower
- →Single-fund global REIT solution avoids domestic/international rebalancing complexity — REET provides all-in-one global real estate exposure; investors don't need to manage a VNQ + VNQI combination or decide on U.S. vs. international allocation percentages
- →U.S. REIT weight reflects the dominance of U.S. real estate capital markets — U.S. REITs represent approximately 60% of global REIT market capitalization; REET's U.S. weighting reflects this legitimate market dominance rather than arbitrary geographic allocation
- →FTSE EPRA Nareit index is the global REIT industry standard — the EPRA Nareit index family is sponsored by the European Public Real Estate Association and National Association of REITs; it's the most widely followed global REIT benchmark
- →Currency risk from holding real estate in foreign currencies — VNQI's returns are affected by the JPY, AUD, GBP, EUR, and other currency movements; a strengthening USD reduces VNQI's USD returns
- →Japanese REIT concentration creates single-country risk — Japan is typically 20-25% of VNQI; Bank of Japan interest rate normalization (after decades at zero) created headwinds for Japanese REITs
- →International real estate markets have underperformed U.S. REITs in recent years — U.S. REITs (VNQ) significantly outperformed international REITs (VNQI) during the 2010s as U.S. commercial real estate recovered faster and U.S. REITs benefited from strong domestic economic growth
- →U.S. dominance in REET means it's mostly a U.S. REIT fund with international diversification added — investors wanting significant international real estate exposure may find REET's 60-65% U.S. weight insufficient diversification from domestic real estate
- →Interest rate sensitivity affects all REIT ETFs — REITs are capital-intensive, dividend-paying instruments; rising interest rates increase REIT borrowing costs, reduce the relative yield attractiveness of REIT dividends versus bonds, and typically pressure REIT valuations
- →Overlapping U.S. REIT exposure with VNQ or other domestic REIT holdings creates double-counting — investors holding REET who also hold VNQ for U.S. REITs have redundant U.S. REIT exposure; VNQI avoids this issue for investors with separate U.S. REIT allocations
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.