brimindinvest.com / compare / xli-vs-paveLIVE
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund · ETF / Industrials Sector
$180.91
+7.21% this month
VERSUS
COMPARE
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF · ETF / Infrastructure Theme
$58.56
+8.91% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
XLI
4
PAVE
1
XLI LEADS 4/5
Comparison scoreboard
XLI LEADS 4/5
Exp. Ratio
XLI 0.08%
PAVE 0.47%
1Y Return
XLI +28.93%
PAVE +40.49%
Div. Yield
XLI 1.18%
PAVE 0.78%
AUM
XLI $30.22B
PAVE $13.54B
Beta
XLI 1.00
PAVE 1.22
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take

XLI vs PAVE Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside

XLI and PAVE both provide industrial sector exposure but with different emphasis. XLI is the broad S&P 500 industrials sector ETF including defense, transportation, and professional services. PAVE is the infrastructure-focused thematic ETF specifically targeting construction materials, equipment, and electrical components benefiting from IIJA infrastructure spending. XLI is cheaper and more diversified; PAVE is more targeted for infrastructure investment thesis.

XLI vs PAVE — XLI (the S&P 500 industrials sector ETF with broad coverage of defense, machinery, transportation, and professional services at 0.09% expense ratio) versus PAVE (the infrastructure thematic ETF targeting construction materials, equipment, and electrical components aligned with IIJA infrastructure spending at 0.47%).

Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026

XLI holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. PAVE has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+40.49% vs +28.93% for XLI).

Normalized 1Y performance
XLI
PAVE
Recent returns
XLI
PAVE
Who should consider this stock?
XLI may suit investors who:
  • want the broadest industrial sector exposure including defense, transportation, machinery, and services in a single low-cost ETF
  • prefer 0.09% expense ratio and maximum liquidity for tactical or strategic industrial sector allocation
  • value defense and aerospace exposure (RTX, Lockheed, General Dynamics) that PAVE's infrastructure focus excludes
  • are comfortable with cyclical machinery and Boeing company-specific risk
PAVE may suit investors who:
  • specifically want infrastructure spending exposure — IIJA-aligned construction materials (Vulcan, Martin Marietta) and electrical components are PAVE's core differentiator
  • believe US infrastructure capital spending cycle is a multi-year theme worth targeted exposure beyond the diluted weighting in broad industrial ETFs
  • value the infrastructure thesis alignment even at 0.47% expense ratio vs XLI's 0.09%
  • are comfortable with thematic concentration and infrastructure cycle risk if government spending slows or reallocates
Performance & AI score
MetricXLIPAVE
ETF score81.065.0
Latest close$180.91$58.56
1M return+7.21%+8.91%
6M return+18.57%+23.13%
1Y return+28.93%+40.49%
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)

How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?

PeriodXLIPAVE
1Y ago$13.07K (+30.7%)
started 2025-06-18
$14.18K (+41.8%)
started 2025-06-18
5Y ago$21.2K (+112.0%)
started 2021-06-18
$25.47K (+154.7%)
started 2021-06-18
10Y ago$45.84K (+358.4%)
started 2016-06-20
$44.74K (+347.4%)
started 2017-03-08

Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fund characteristics
MetricXLIPAVE
Expense ratio0.08%0.47%
Total assets (AUM)$30.22B$13.54B
Dividend yield1.18%0.78%
Trailing P/E31.4231.19
Beta1.001.22
52-week change28.93%40.49%
Risk & fund metrics
MetricXLIPAVE
1Y return+28.93%+40.49%
6M return+18.57%+23.13%
1M return+7.21%+8.91%
1Y Sharpe ratio1.381.62
Beta1.001.22
Dividend yield1.18%0.78%
5Y CAGR+14.41%+19.69%
Drawdown & downside risk

Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.

1Y risk snapshot
XLI max drawdown12.21%
PAVE max drawdown11.91%
XLI max wkly drop4.45%
PAVE max wkly drop6.37%
5Y risk snapshot
XLI max drawdown21.64%
PAVE max drawdown26.23%
XLI max wkly drop11.68%
PAVE max wkly drop12.00%
10Y risk snapshot
XLI max drawdown42.33%
PAVE max drawdown44.08%
XLI max wkly drop20.13%
PAVE max wkly drop23.08%
Performance metrics by period
PeriodMetricXLIPAVE
1YGrowth+28.93%+40.49%
CAGR+28.95%+40.52%
Sharpe ratio1.381.62
Max drawdown12.21%11.91%
Max daily drop3.38%3.27%
Max wkly drop4.45%6.37%
5YGrowth+96.00%+145.62%
CAGR+14.41%+19.69%
Sharpe ratio0.600.73
Max drawdown21.64%26.23%
Max daily drop6.29%6.63%
Max wkly drop11.68%12.00%
10YGrowth+281.13%+321.14%
CAGR+14.33%+16.76%
Sharpe ratio0.550.58
Max drawdown42.33%44.08%
Max daily drop11.34%13.58%
Max wkly drop20.13%23.08%
Fund overview
CategoryXLIPAVE
Fund nameState Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETFGlobal X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF
TypeETFETF
Expense ratio0.08%0.47%
Total assets (AUM)$30.22B$13.54B
Dividend yield1.18%0.78%
XLI strengths
  • Broadest industrial sector coverage: XLI's 77+ holdings cover aerospace/defense, transportation, machinery, professional services, and industrial conglomerates in a single low-cost ETF
  • Defense exposure through RTX, Lockheed, General Dynamics: XLI's aerospace and defense names provide geopolitical risk hedging and government spending exposure
  • 0.09% expense ratio with excellent liquidity: XLI is the most traded industrial sector ETF — best for tactical and strategic industrial positioning
PAVE strengths
  • Pure infrastructure spending exposure: PAVE specifically targets companies benefiting from infrastructure construction and spending — construction materials, equipment, and electrical components are core holdings
  • IIJA and infrastructure legislation alignment: PAVE is designed to capture the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) $1.2T spending impact — direct exposure to government infrastructure capex cycle
  • Higher concentration in construction materials: Vulcan Materials, Martin Marietta, and steel companies in PAVE provide direct infrastructure materials exposure that broad industrials ETFs dilute
Risks to watch — XLI
  • Boeing concentration risk: Boeing's significant index weight creates company-specific risk — Boeing's quality control and 737 MAX issues have meaningfully impacted XLI at times
  • Cyclical industrial machinery exposure: Caterpillar and Deere are highly cyclical — commodity/construction downturns directly impact these XLI holdings
  • Diluted infrastructure exposure: XLI's broad industrial mandate means pure infrastructure plays are diluted by defense, professional services, and transportation holdings
Risks to watch — PAVE
  • More concentrated theme vs broad XLI: PAVE's infrastructure focus means it underperforms XLI when defense or transportation (not in PAVE focus) outperform
  • Higher expense ratio (~0.47%) vs XLI's 0.09%: PAVE's thematic ETF costs 5x more than XLI — a meaningful fee disadvantage over long holding periods
  • Infrastructure spending cycle risk: if government infrastructure spending slows or IIJA funds are delayed, PAVE's thesis-specific exposure underperforms broader industrials
Frequently asked questions
PAVE's investment thesis is that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), signed in 2021, would direct $1.2 trillion in government spending toward roads, bridges, broadband, water systems, and electrical grid upgrades over 5-8 years. Companies producing construction aggregates (Vulcan Materials, Martin Marietta — the crushed stone in every road project), construction equipment (Caterpillar), and electrical grid components (Eaton, Hubbell) would directly benefit from this spending wave. PAVE concentrates on these specific beneficiaries.
AI Prediction SignalNext 5 trading days
Members only
XLI
+2.8%BUY
PAVE
+1.1%HOLD

Sign up to unlock AI price predictions

ML model trained on historical prices · 14-day free trial · No credit card required
Free public comparison

Want deeper AI forecasts?

This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.

Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →