LIVE
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF · ETF - Active Innovation Growth
$80.19
+8.60% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
QQQM
Invesco QQQM ETF · ETF - Passive Nasdaq-100 Index
$304.52
+5.43% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
ARKK
0
QQQM
5
Comparison scoreboard
QQQM LEADS 5/5Exp. Ratio
ARKK 0.75%
QQQM ✓0.15%
1Y Return
ARKK +20.10%
QQQM ✓+40.56%
Div. Yield
ARKK 0.00%
QQQM ✓0.42%
AUM
ARKK $7.26B
QQQM ✓$96.91B
Beta
ARKK 1.98
QQQM ✓1.23
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
ARKK vs QQQM Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and QQQM (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ETF) are both technology-focused ETFs but with fundamentally different philosophies — ARK's active concentrated bets on early-stage disruptive companies versus QQQM's passive exposure to the 100 largest Nasdaq companies dominated by proven mega-cap technology giants. QQQM offers lower cost and more established companies; ARKK offers higher risk/reward with smaller, earlier-stage innovation companies.
ARKK vs QQQM is active disruptive innovation concentration (ARK's high-conviction early-stage technology bets) versus passive mega-cap technology indexing (Nasdaq-100's 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq companies dominated by established technology giants) — fundamentally different risk profiles with very different cost structures and historical return patterns.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
QQQM holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. QQQM has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+40.56% vs +20.10% for ARKK).
Normalized 1Y performance
ARKK
QQQM
Recent returns
ARKK
QQQM
Who should consider this stock?
ARKK may suit investors who:
- →Want concentrated exposure to ARK Invest's active research in disruptive innovation across AI, genomics, robotics, and fintech — willing to accept higher fees and volatility for early-stage technology bets
- →Value Cathie Wood's public investment thesis and transparency into ARK's research as a way to understand the specific companies and technologies being backed
- →Accept that ARKK has significantly underperformed passive indexes since its 2020 peak and believe in mean reversion if disruptive technology innovation enters another bull cycle
QQQM may suit investors who:
- →Want low-cost (0.15% expense ratio) passive exposure to the 100 largest Nasdaq-listed companies — primarily mega-cap technology like Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon
- →Value the simplicity and long track record of Nasdaq-100 indexing as a proven technology-growth investment approach over multiple decades
- →Prefer established profitable mega-cap technology leadership over speculative early-stage innovation bets at significantly lower cost than active management
Performance & AI score
| Metric | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 29.0 | 85.0 |
| Latest close | $80.19 | $304.52 |
| 1M return | +8.60% | +5.43% |
| 6M return | +3.20% | +23.52% |
| 1Y return | +20.10% | +40.56% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $12.01K (+20.1%) started 2025-06-18 | $14.13K (+41.3%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $6.97K (-30.3%) started 2021-06-18 | $23.06K (+130.6%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $48.04K (+380.4%) started 2016-06-20 | $26.97K (+169.7%) started 2020-10-13 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fund characteristics
| Metric | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $7.26B | $96.91B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Trailing P/E | 47.49 | 33.01 |
| Beta | 1.98 | 1.23 |
| 52-week change | 20.10% | 40.56% |
Risk & fund metrics
| Metric | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +20.10% | +40.56% |
| 6M return | +3.20% | +23.52% |
| 1M return | +8.60% | +5.43% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 1.78 |
| Beta | 1.98 | 1.23 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| 5Y CAGR | -7.27% | +17.43% |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
ARKK max drawdown31.35%
QQQM max drawdown11.96%
ARKK max wkly drop14.57%
QQQM max wkly drop6.75%
5Y risk snapshot
ARKK max drawdown77.17%
QQQM max drawdown35.04%
ARKK max wkly drop29.56%
QQQM max wkly drop11.92%
10Y risk snapshot
ARKK max drawdown80.91%
QQQM max drawdown35.04%
ARKK max wkly drop29.56%
QQQM max wkly drop11.92%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +20.10% | +40.56% |
| CAGR | +20.11% | +40.60% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 1.78 | |
| Max drawdown | 31.35% | 11.96% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.97% | 4.78% | |
| Max wkly drop | 14.57% | 6.75% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -31.43% | +123.27% |
| CAGR | -7.27% | +17.43% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.03 | 0.63 | |
| Max drawdown | 77.17% | 35.04% | |
| Max daily drop | 10.10% | 6.11% | |
| Max wkly drop | 29.56% | 11.92% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +341.88% | +160.42% |
| CAGR | +16.03% | +18.36% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.46 | 0.67 | |
| Max drawdown | 80.91% | 35.04% | |
| Max daily drop | 15.57% | 6.11% | |
| Max wkly drop | 29.56% | 11.92% |
Fund overview
| Category | ARKK | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | ARK Innovation ETF | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $7.26B | $96.91B |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
ARKK strengths
- →Unique concentrated disruptive innovation portfolio that provides exposure to early-stage disruptive companies not well-represented in passive indexes like the Nasdaq-100
- →Cathie Wood and ARK's public research (published investment theses, target prices) creates transparency into the investment rationale beyond typical active fund opacity
- →High-beta exposure to technology innovation cycle — in bull markets for growth technology, ARKK can dramatically outperform passive indexes
QQQM strengths
- →Ultra-low cost (0.15% expense ratio) passive access to the world's most successful technology companies in a single ETF with decades of track record (original QQQ launched 1999)
- →Mega-cap technology weighting provides concentration in the highest-quality, most profitable technology companies globally — Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Alphabet, and Meta have exceptional competitive moats
- →Nasdaq-100's technology weighting means QQQM has historically outperformed the broader S&P 500 over long periods as technology companies have grown earnings faster than the market average
Risks to watch — ARKK
- →ARKK's 2020 peak return was extraordinary, but subsequent performance has been poor — the concentrated growth portfolio declined severely in the 2022 rate-rise environment
- →High expense ratio (0.75%) versus near-zero costs of passive Nasdaq-100 ETFs (QQQ, QQQM) is a significant long-term performance headwind
- →Concentrated position risk — ARKK holds a relatively small number of positions (typically 35-55) heavily weighted to a few companies like Tesla, which creates idiosyncratic risk
Risks to watch — QQQM
- →Nasdaq-100 is heavily concentrated in mega-cap technology — top 10 holdings typically represent 50%+ of the index, concentrating risk in a few large companies
- →QQQM underperforms in value/cyclical market rotations — when investors favor financials, energy, or consumer staples, the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 can meaningfully underperform broader indexes
- →Passive indexing amplifies both gains and losses from mega-cap technology — if Apple, Microsoft, or NVIDIA underperform, QQQM underperforms proportionally
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →