LIVE
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF · Technology ETF
$304.52
+5.43% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF · Technology ETF
$120.04
+7.64% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
QQQM
2
VGT
3
Comparison scoreboard
VGT LEADS 3/5Exp. Ratio
QQQM 0.15%
VGT ✓0.09%
1Y Return
QQQM +40.56%
VGT ✓+52.80%
Div. Yield
QQQM ✓0.42%
VGT 0.32%
AUM
QQQM $96.91B
VGT ✓$170.1B
Beta
QQQM ✓1.23
VGT 1.35
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
QQQM vs VGT ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
QQQM and VGT are both popular tech-focused ETFs but with meaningfully different compositions. QQQM tracks the NASDAQ-100 — including Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla alongside pure technology stocks. VGT tracks only the GICS technology sector — excluding those companies but providing purer software and semiconductor exposure. QQQM is a broader 'growth and technology' ETF; VGT is a pure technology sector ETF.
QQQM vs VGT — QQQM provides broader mega-cap growth exposure including Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla alongside pure technology in the NASDAQ-100 (includes AI platform companies across sector classifications) while VGT provides pure GICS technology sector exposure with higher semiconductor/software concentration and excluding the internet/consumer platform mega-caps.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
VGT holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. VGT has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+52.80% vs +40.56% for QQQM).
Normalized 1Y performance
QQQM
VGT
Recent returns
QQQM
VGT
Who should consider this stock?
QQQM may suit investors who:
- →prefer broader mega-cap growth exposure combining pure technology with Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, and Tesla across the NASDAQ-100's 100 largest non-financial companies
- →value QQQM's inclusion of AI platform mega-caps (Alphabet/Google cloud, Meta AI, Amazon AWS) that VGT classifies outside the technology sector
- →want the most liquid large-cap US growth ETF proxy with the deepest options market for hedging and covered call strategies
- →are comfortable with higher expense ratio vs VGT (0.15% vs 0.10%), NASDAQ sector classification quirks, and biotech/healthcare inclusion alongside technology growth
VGT may suit investors who:
- →prefer pure technology sector exposure including only GICS technology companies — software, semiconductors, IT services, and hardware without internet platforms or consumer tech
- →value VGT's lower expense ratio (0.10% vs QQQM's 0.15%) for long-term compounding efficiency
- →want technology sector allocation specifically to increase semiconductor and software weight relative to internet/platform companies
- →are comfortable with excluding Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, and Tesla from technology allocation (requiring separate positions if desired), and higher semiconductor cycle concentration
Performance & AI score
| Metric | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 85.0 | 86.0 |
| Latest close | $304.52 | $120.04 |
| 1M return | +5.43% | +7.64% |
| 6M return | +23.52% | +31.61% |
| 1Y return | +40.56% | +52.80% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $14.13K (+41.3%) started 2025-06-18 | $15.35K (+53.5%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $23.06K (+130.6%) started 2021-06-18 | $26.74K (+167.4%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $26.97K (+169.7%) started 2020-10-13 | $107.06K (+970.6%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fund characteristics
| Metric | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $96.91B | $170.1B |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.32% |
| Trailing P/E | 33.01 | 36.07 |
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.35 |
| 52-week change | 40.56% | 52.80% |
Risk & fund metrics
| Metric | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +40.56% | +52.80% |
| 6M return | +23.52% | +31.61% |
| 1M return | +5.43% | +7.64% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 1.78 | 1.81 |
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.35 |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.32% |
| 5Y CAGR | +17.43% | +20.92% |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
QQQM max drawdown11.96%
VGT max drawdown16.40%
QQQM max wkly drop6.75%
VGT max wkly drop9.34%
5Y risk snapshot
QQQM max drawdown35.04%
VGT max drawdown35.07%
QQQM max wkly drop11.92%
VGT max wkly drop14.00%
10Y risk snapshot
QQQM max drawdown35.04%
VGT max drawdown35.07%
QQQM max wkly drop11.92%
VGT max wkly drop17.57%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +40.56% | +52.80% |
| CAGR | +40.60% | +52.84% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.78 | 1.81 | |
| Max drawdown | 11.96% | 16.40% | |
| Max daily drop | 4.78% | 6.14% | |
| Max wkly drop | 6.75% | 9.34% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +123.27% | +158.45% |
| CAGR | +17.43% | +20.92% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.63 | 0.70 | |
| Max drawdown | 35.04% | 35.07% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.11% | 7.24% | |
| Max wkly drop | 11.92% | 14.00% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +160.42% | +873.65% |
| CAGR | +18.36% | +25.58% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.67 | 0.86 | |
| Max drawdown | 35.04% | 35.07% | |
| Max daily drop | 6.11% | 13.49% | |
| Max wkly drop | 11.92% | 17.57% |
Fund overview
| Category | QQQM | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $96.91B | $170.1B |
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | 0.32% |
QQQM strengths
- →Diversification beyond pure tech: QQQM includes Amazon (consumer/cloud), Tesla (EV), Costco (retail), Netflix (streaming), and biotech companies alongside pure technology stocks
- →AI mega-cap concentration: QQQM's top holdings (Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet) are the primary AI infrastructure and application beneficiaries
- →High liquidity and options market: QQQ (the equivalent institutional product) has the deepest US equity ETF options market for hedging and leverage strategies
VGT strengths
- →Pure technology sector exposure: VGT tracks only GICS technology sector companies — investors get the purest tech sector allocation without consumer discretionary, healthcare, or communication services dilution
- →Lowest expense ratio: VGT's 0.10% expense ratio is one of the lowest in the technology ETF universe — maximizing compounding after fees
- →Broader technology sector: VGT includes smaller-cap technology companies beyond the NASDAQ-100's size threshold — providing mid-cap tech exposure
Risks to watch — QQQM
- →Healthcare and biotech excluded: the NASDAQ-100 excludes financial companies but includes biotech and healthcare — mixing technology growth with biotech binary risk
- →Concentration in mega-caps: top 10 holdings represent 50%+ of QQQM — amplifying both upside and downside of mega-cap tech performance
- →Expense ratio higher than VGT: QQQM has 0.15% expense ratio vs VGT's 0.10% — over long periods, expense differences compound
Risks to watch — VGT
- →Excludes Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, Tesla: VGT misses major technology and tech-adjacent companies classified outside GICS technology — investors wanting these must separately allocate
- →Heavier semiconductor weight: Nvidia, TSMC-ADR, Broadcom, and other semiconductor companies represent a larger percentage of VGT vs QQQM — higher semiconductor cycle exposure
- →Excludes mega-cap internet companies: since Google/Meta/Amazon are in Communication Services or Consumer Discretionary, VGT underperforms in periods driven by these stocks
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →