LIVE
BATT
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) · ETF - Lithium & Battery Ecosystem
$16.57
+3.76% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) · ETF - Lithium Mining & Battery
$82.15
+0.45% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across expense ratio, momentum, yield, fund size, risk
BATT
2
LIT
3
Comparison scoreboard
LIT LEADS 3/5Exp. Ratio
BATT ✓0.59%
LIT 0.75%
1Y Return
BATT +88.98%
LIT ✓+125.18%
Div. Yield
BATT ✓1.48%
LIT 0.36%
AUM
BATT $140.46M
LIT ✓$2.24B
Beta
BATT 1.13
LIT ✓1.01
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
BATT vs LIT ETF Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BATT and LIT both provide exposure to the lithium and battery technology ecosystem but with different approaches — BATT (Amplify, actively managed) spans the full battery ecosystem including energy storage and grid batteries alongside EVs and mining, while LIT (Global X, passive index) focuses on lithium mining and battery manufacturers with more concentrated upstream exposure. Both are significantly sensitive to lithium price cycles and EV adoption trends.
BATT vs LIT is actively managed broad battery ecosystem ETF with diversified multi-segment exposure (Amplify's BATT spanning lithium mining, battery cell manufacturing, EV makers, and grid energy storage companies in an active portfolio that can adapt to technology changes) versus passive lithium mining and battery index ETF with concentrated upstream exposure (Global X's LIT tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index with heavier lithium miner concentration providing maximum leverage to lithium price cycles) — diversified ecosystem versus concentrated lithium pure-play.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
LIT holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LIT has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+125.18% vs +88.98% for BATT).
Normalized 1Y performance
BATT
LIT
Recent returns
BATT
LIT
Who should consider this stock?
BATT may suit investors who:
- →Want diversified battery ecosystem exposure spanning lithium mining, battery manufacturing, EV makers, and grid energy storage companies to reduce single-segment risk within the battery technology theme
- →Value active management's ability to adjust portfolio allocation between battery ecosystem segments as the technology evolves and relative attractiveness changes
- →Are interested in grid-scale energy storage (utility battery projects, behind-the-meter storage) as a growth driver alongside EV adoption
LIT may suit investors who:
- →Want concentrated lithium mining and battery manufacturer exposure with maximum leverage to lithium price cycles and EV demand acceleration
- →Prefer passive index ETF transparency with consistent, rules-based methodology versus actively managed BATT's manager discretion
- →Believe lithium miners (Albemarle, SQM, Arcadium Lithium) will be the primary beneficiaries of the long-term EV adoption trend regardless of which specific EV brands or battery chemistries win
Performance & AI score
| Metric | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| ETF score | 39.0 | 47.0 |
| Latest close | $16.57 | $82.15 |
| 1M return | +3.76% | +0.45% |
| 6M return | +24.18% | +29.48% |
| 1Y return | +88.98% | +125.18% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $19.25K (+92.5%) started 2025-06-18 | $22.66K (+126.6%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $13.3K (+33.0%) started 2021-06-18 | $12.99K (+29.9%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $12.05K (+20.5%) started 2018-06-06 | $43.88K (+338.8%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fund characteristics
| Metric | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $140.46M | $2.24B |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.36% |
| Trailing P/E | 26.19 | 24.52 |
| Beta | 1.13 | 1.01 |
| 52-week change | 88.98% | 125.18% |
Risk & fund metrics
| Metric | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y return | +88.98% | +125.18% |
| 6M return | +24.18% | +29.48% |
| 1M return | +3.76% | +0.45% |
| 1Y Sharpe ratio | 2.00 | 2.44 |
| Beta | 1.13 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.36% |
| 5Y CAGR | +2.65% | +4.56% |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
BATT max drawdown17.03%
LIT max drawdown16.46%
BATT max wkly drop12.46%
LIT max wkly drop10.45%
5Y risk snapshot
BATT max drawdown61.98%
LIT max drawdown65.91%
BATT max wkly drop18.00%
LIT max wkly drop17.59%
10Y risk snapshot
BATT max drawdown69.38%
LIT max drawdown65.91%
BATT max wkly drop23.75%
LIT max wkly drop23.26%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +88.98% | +125.18% |
| CAGR | +89.06% | +125.31% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.00 | 2.44 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.03% | 16.46% | |
| Max daily drop | 7.14% | 8.80% | |
| Max wkly drop | 12.46% | 10.45% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +13.98% | +24.99% |
| CAGR | +2.65% | +4.56% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.09 | 0.16 | |
| Max drawdown | 61.98% | 65.91% | |
| Max daily drop | 7.78% | 8.80% | |
| Max wkly drop | 18.00% | 17.59% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -1.74% | +277.56% |
| CAGR | -0.22% | +14.22% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.00 | 0.44 | |
| Max drawdown | 69.38% | 65.91% | |
| Max daily drop | 12.69% | 13.58% | |
| Max wkly drop | 23.75% | 23.26% |
Fund overview
| Category | BATT | LIT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund name | Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF | Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF |
| Type | ETF | ETF |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Total assets (AUM) | $140.46M | $2.24B |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | 0.36% |
BATT strengths
- →Diversified battery ecosystem exposure reduces single-segment concentration — BATT holds companies across lithium mining, battery cells, EVs, and energy storage; if lithium prices fall (pressuring miners), EV adoption strength may support other holdings
- →Active management allows portfolio adjustment as battery technology evolves — unlike index ETFs locked to a fixed methodology, BATT's active management can respond to technology shifts (e.g., LFP vs NMC battery chemistry competition, sodium-ion battery emergence)
- →Captures energy storage and grid battery market growth alongside EV batteries — BATT's mandate includes grid-scale energy storage companies (Fluence, Eos Energy) providing exposure to the utility-scale battery market driven by renewable energy integration
LIT strengths
- →Concentrated lithium mining exposure provides maximum leverage to lithium demand growth — LIT's heavier allocation to lithium miners (Albemarle, SQM, Arcadium Lithium) means LIT outperforms BATT significantly when lithium prices rise and demand accelerates
- →Albemarle and SQM are the world's leading lithium producers — LIT's holdings include the two largest lithium chemical producers globally; these companies benefit directly from lithium demand growth regardless of which EV maker or battery chemistry wins the technology competition
- →Lower expense ratio and index transparency — as a passive index ETF, LIT provides transparent, rules-based exposure with consistent methodology; investors know exactly what drives returns
Risks to watch — BATT
- →Lithium price volatility creates significant NAV swings — lithium carbonate prices fell approximately 90% from the 2022 peak; this directly impaired the mining company portion of BATT's portfolio and demonstrated the commodity risk embedded in battery technology ETFs
- →EV adoption slowdown risk — if EV adoption slows (as occurred in 2023-2024 with consumer range anxiety and charging infrastructure concerns), EV manufacturers and indirectly battery companies face revenue growth challenges
- →Concentration in China-related supply chain — CATL (China's dominant battery maker), BYD, and Chinese lithium producers are major holdings; U.S.-China trade tensions and potential EV tariffs create geopolitical risk within BATT's portfolio
Risks to watch — LIT
- →Heavier upstream mining concentration means greater lithium price commodity risk — LIT's significant weighting in lithium miners means the fund's performance is more directly tied to lithium carbonate and hydroxide spot prices than BATT
- →Index methodology may lag technology shifts — if the Solactive Global Lithium Index is slow to adapt to battery technology changes (e.g., sodium-ion batteries reducing lithium demand), LIT investors hold companies whose addressable market has changed
- →China supply chain concentration — CATL and BYD are major LIT holdings; the geopolitical risk of significant China exposure (tariffs, sanctions, technology restrictions) affects LIT's portfolio
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →