NVTS vs WOLF Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
NVTS and WOLF compete in wide-bandgap power semiconductors but use different materials (GaN vs SiC) and operate at different scales. NVTS targets lower-voltage, high-frequency applications like chargers and data center power with a fabless model, while WOLF dominates the higher-voltage SiC market critical for EV drivetrains with a capital-intensive integrated manufacturing strategy. Both are pre-profitability, but WOLF's debt burden and fab ramp make it a higher-stakes turnaround story.
The choice between NVTS and WOLF comes down to GaN vs SiC adoption curves and risk tolerance: NVTS is a smaller-scale, higher-growth-rate fabless bet on GaN penetration, while WOLF is a high-leverage vertical manufacturer whose returns depend on EV demand materializing at scale.
WOLF holds the edge across 2 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for WOLF (-30.33%) than for NVTS (-39.79%).
- →prefer a fabless, asset-light model with lower capital intensity than integrated chip manufacturers
- →value GaN's technical advantages in high-frequency, lower-voltage power conversion applications
- →want exposure to the data center power efficiency theme alongside EV charging infrastructure
- →are comfortable with pre-profitability growth stocks in small-cap semiconductors
- →prefer vertically integrated manufacturers with proprietary substrate supply chains
- →value SiC's dominance in high-voltage EV drivetrains and industrial power conversion
- →want exposure to the 800V EV platform adoption cycle with a market-leading supplier
- →are comfortable with high financial leverage and a multi-year fab ramp thesis
| Metric | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 31.0 | 38.5 |
| AI rank | #2202 | #1272 |
| Latest close | $24.02 | $57.41 |
| 1M return | +23.62% | -2.41% |
| 6M return | +225.47% | +234.75% |
| 1Y return | +243.14% | N/A |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $34.31K (+243.1%) started 2025-06-18 | $25.98K (+159.8%) started 2025-09-29 |
| 5Y ago | $18.77K (+87.7%) started 2021-10-20 | $25.98K (+159.8%) started 2025-09-29 |
| 10Y ago | $18.77K (+87.7%) started 2021-10-20 | $25.98K (+159.8%) started 2025-09-29 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.85B | $2.98B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | N/A |
| Forward P/E | -173.40 | -11.47 |
| Price/Sales | 144.46 | 4.19 |
| EV/Revenue | 122.19 | 3.99 |
| Analyst target | $14.46 | $40.00 |
| Target upside | -39.79% | -30.33% |
| Metric | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -38.70% | -19.00% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS growth | N/A | N/A |
| FCF margin | +108.10% | +10.77% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 0.00% | -72.93% |
| ROIC proxy | -35.15% | -84.19% |
| Return on equity | -35.15% | -84.19% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 3.76 | 6.09 |
| Debt/equity | 1.51 | 179.16 |
| Current ratio | 4.33 | 7.03 |
| Quick ratio | 3.95 | 5.51 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +243.14% | +159.77% |
| CAGR | +243.43% | +278.43% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.55 | 1.64 | |
| Max drawdown | 58.25% | 58.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 18.23% | 18.22% | |
| Max wkly drop | 41.75% | 36.70% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +87.66% | +159.77% |
| CAGR | +14.46% | +278.43% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 1.64 | |
| Max drawdown | 92.04% | 58.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 20.70% | 18.22% | |
| Max wkly drop | 41.75% | 36.70% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +87.66% | +159.77% |
| CAGR | +14.46% | +278.43% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 1.64 | |
| Max drawdown | 92.04% | 58.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 20.70% | 18.22% | |
| Max wkly drop | 41.75% | 36.70% |
| Category | NVTS | WOLF |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Navitas Semiconductor Corporation | Wolfspeed, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Navitas Semiconductor designs gallium nitride (GaN) power ICs targeting EV chargers, mobile fast chargers, data center power supplies, and solar inverters. Its GaNFast and GaNSense product families integrate gate drivers and protection circuits monolithically, enabling higher switching frequencies and smaller system form factors than silicon. Revenue is concentrated in consumer and mobile markets with growing data center and EV design-win pipelines. | Wolfspeed is the leading pure-play silicon carbide (SiC) semiconductor manufacturer, producing SiC substrates, epitaxial wafers, power devices, and RF components for EV drivetrains, industrial motor drives, and energy infrastructure. Its Mohawk Valley Fab in New York and planned JP-Fab expansion represent a multi-billion-dollar vertical integration strategy to control SiC crystal growth through finished device. Revenue is split between materials (wafer sales) and devices (power modules and discretes). |
| Investor focus | Investors track design-win momentum in EV and data center segments, gross margin expansion as the product mix shifts from consumer to higher-value industrial markets, and quarterly revenue growth rates against the GaN adoption curve. | Investors focus on Mohawk Valley Fab utilization ramp, long-term supply agreements (design-ins) with automotive OEMs, debt load relative to free cash flow generation, and the pace of SiC adoption in 800V EV platforms replacing IGBT modules. |
- →Proprietary monolithic GaN integration reduces BOM cost and board space versus discrete silicon alternatives
- →Strong design-win pipeline in EV on-board chargers and 800V fast-charge infrastructure
- →Asset-light fabless model with TSMC manufacturing underpins capital efficiency
- →Largest SiC substrate manufacturer globally with decades of crystal-growth IP
- →Captive wafer supply gives cost and quality advantages over fabless SiC device competitors
- →Multi-year design-in agreements with major automotive Tier 1 suppliers provide revenue visibility
- →Concentrated customer base in mobile/consumer exposes revenue to smartphone cycle weakness
- →Sustained operating losses require continued access to capital markets
- →Wolfspeed, onsemi, and Infineon all offer competing wide-bandgap solutions with larger sales forces
- →Massive capital expenditure program has pushed debt to levels that require sustained revenue ramp to service
- →EV adoption slowdown directly delays Mohawk Valley Fab utilization reaching breakeven
- →onsemi and STMicroelectronics are aggressively ramping SiC capacity, compressing ASPs
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.