LIVE
INTC
Intel Corporation · Technology
$133.99
+20.93% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. · Technology
$537.37
+29.78% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
INTC
1
AMD
4
Comparison scoreboard
AMD LEADS 4/5AI Score
INTC 49.9
AMD ✓79.0
1Y Return
INTC ✓+544.18%
AMD +322.79%
Fwd P/E
INTC 80.80
AMD ✓39.04
Target Up.
INTC -25.25%
AMD ✓-4.93%
Op. Margin
INTC 6.88%
AMD ✓14.40%
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
INTC vs AMD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
Intel and AMD are x86 CPU rivals competing in PC and server markets, with AMD winning significant server market share over the past five years. Intel retains massive installed base advantages but has struggled with manufacturing execution. AMD is the lean fabless model using TSMC's superior processes to outperform Intel's CPUs. Both are also entering AI accelerator markets — Intel with Gaudi, AMD with MI300X — competing against Nvidia's dominant GPU platform.
INTC vs AMD is the integrated semiconductor company in foundry recovery mode with massive installed base but process technology challenges (Intel) versus the lean fabless CPU market share gainer using TSMC processes to outperform Intel and beginning to challenge Nvidia in AI (AMD) — AMD's fabless advantage and EPYC momentum contrast with Intel's manufacturing recovery bet.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
AMD holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. INTC has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+544.18% vs +322.79%), though AMD trades at the lower forward P/E (39.04x vs 80.80x). AMD leads on both revenue growth (37.80%) and operating margin (14.40%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for AMD (-4.93%) than for INTC (-25.25%).
Normalized 1Y performance
INTC
AMD
Recent returns
INTC
AMD
Analyst price targets & sentiment
INTC · 35 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Hold (3.0/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$14.00
analyst mean$93.12
current price$133.99
-25.2% upside to analyst mean
AMD · 48 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Strong Buy (1.5/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$225.00
analyst high$625.00
analyst mean$486.33
current price$537.37
-4.9% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
INTC may suit investors who:
- →prefer a value-oriented semiconductor recovery play if Intel's 18A manufacturing process achieves process technology leadership by 2025–2026
- →value Intel Foundry Services as a US domestic semiconductor manufacturing strategic asset receiving CHIPS Act support
- →want the deep x86 server installed base that still runs data centers globally as an upgrade cycle revenue foundation
- →are comfortable with AMD market share pressure, foundry timeline slippage risk, and capital-intensive integrated manufacturing model complexity
AMD may suit investors who:
- →prefer the lean fabless CPU market share gainer using TSMC's superior manufacturing to consistently outperform Intel Xeon on performance-per-watt
- →value AMD EPYC's multi-year server market share trajectory as a structural shift driven by process technology advantage
- →want AI accelerator diversification exposure with MI300X as hyperscalers seek alternatives to Nvidia's GPU pricing power
- →are comfortable with Nvidia's CUDA software moat limiting MI300X AI adoption and Intel's potential foundry recovery reducing AMD's process advantage
Performance & AI score
| Metric | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 49.9 | 79.0 |
| AI rank | #476 | #10 |
| Latest close | $133.99 | $537.37 |
| 1M return | +20.93% | +29.78% |
| 6M return | +271.68% | +171.25% |
| 1Y return | +544.18% | +322.79% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $62.35K (+523.5%) started 2025-06-18 | $42.38K (+323.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $28.75K (+187.5%) started 2021-06-21 | $65.06K (+550.6%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $65.99K (+559.9%) started 2016-06-20 | $1.05M (+10436.7%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $626.09B | $834.17B |
| Trailing P/E | 759.17 | 169.39 |
| Forward P/E | 80.80 | 39.04 |
| Price/Sales | 1.65 | 24.30 |
| EV/Revenue | 12.13 | 22.05 |
| Analyst target | $93.12 | $486.33 |
| Target upside | -25.25% | -4.93% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 7.20% | 37.80% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | 91.20% |
| EPS growth | N/A | +91.20% |
| FCF margin | -15.44% | +19.15% |
| Operating margin | 6.88% | 14.40% |
| Profit margin | -5.90% | 13.37% |
| ROIC proxy | -2.91% | 8.06% |
| Return on equity | -2.91% | 8.06% |
| Dividend yield | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 2.23 | 2.49 |
| Debt/equity | 36.03 | 6.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.31 | 2.73 |
| Quick ratio | 1.66 | 1.75 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
INTC max drawdown24.17%
AMD max drawdown27.76%
INTC max wkly drop16.43%
AMD max wkly drop23.67%
5Y risk snapshot
INTC max drawdown65.53%
AMD max drawdown65.45%
INTC max wkly drop37.83%
AMD max wkly drop23.91%
10Y risk snapshot
INTC max drawdown70.80%
AMD max drawdown65.45%
INTC max wkly drop37.83%
AMD max wkly drop32.68%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +523.50% | +323.83% |
| CAGR | +525.13% | +324.70% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.77 | 2.43 | |
| Max drawdown | 24.17% | 27.76% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.03% | 17.31% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.43% | 23.67% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +162.07% | +550.65% |
| CAGR | +21.29% | +45.52% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.54 | 0.87 | |
| Max drawdown | 65.53% | 65.45% | |
| Max daily drop | 26.06% | 17.31% | |
| Max wkly drop | 37.83% | 23.91% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +417.94% | +10436.67% |
| CAGR | +17.89% | +59.36% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.49 | 1.02 | |
| Max drawdown | 70.80% | 65.45% | |
| Max daily drop | 26.06% | 24.23% | |
| Max wkly drop | 37.83% | 32.68% |
Business comparison
| Category | INTC | AMD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Intel Corporation | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Core business | Intel is the world's largest semiconductor company by revenue, producing x86 CPUs for PCs, servers (Xeon), networking (Ethernet/InfiniBand), and AI (Gaudi accelerators). Intel uniquely combines chip design with chip manufacturing — running its own foundries (Intel Foundry Services) attempting to offer contract manufacturing to compete with TSMC. Intel's Core Ultra PC processors and Xeon server CPUs remain dominant in installed bases, but AMD has been gaining data center server CPU market share for several years. | AMD designs x86 CPUs (Ryzen for PC, EPYC for servers) and GPUs (Radeon for gaming, MI300X for AI/data center). AMD is fabless — outsourcing manufacturing to TSMC — giving it access to the world's best semiconductor processes without the capital intensity of owning fabs. AMD EPYC server processors have been consistently outperforming Intel Xeon on price/performance, driving multi-year data center market share gains. MI300X AI GPU competes with Nvidia's H100 and is AMD's attempt to capture AI accelerator market share. |
| Investor focus | Investors track data center CPU market share vs AMD, Intel Foundry Services customer wins, PC CPU quarterly share, Gaudi AI accelerator adoption, and the cost and timeline of Intel's foundry manufacturing catch-up to TSMC. | Investors track EPYC server CPU market share vs Intel, MI300X AI GPU sales (the primary growth catalyst in the data center segment), and datacenter revenue as the key earnings driver. |
INTC strengths
- →Installed base of x86 server CPUs is enormous — data centers run Intel Xeon processors for decades, providing upgrade cycle revenue
- →Intel 18A manufacturing process represents Intel's attempt to reclaim process technology leadership by 2025–2026
- →Intel Foundry Services is the US government's strategic priority for domestic semiconductor manufacturing — receiving significant CHIPS Act subsidies
AMD strengths
- →EPYC server CPUs using TSMC's advanced process consistently deliver better performance-per-watt than Intel Xeon, driving multi-year data center market share gain
- →Fabless model leverages TSMC's leading-edge manufacturing without capital intensity — AMD gets TSMC's best process while Intel must build it itself
- →MI300X AI GPU is gaining traction as hyperscalers diversify AI compute vendors — Meta, Microsoft, and others have announced MI300X deployments alongside Nvidia H100
Risks to watch — INTC
- →AMD has been aggressively taking data center CPU market share with EPYC processors — Intel's data center market share has declined from 90%+ to lower levels
- →Intel foundry timeline has slipped repeatedly — 7nm delays, 10nm issues, and Intel 4 timeline changes have eroded confidence in the manufacturing recovery narrative
- →Intel's integrated design+manufacturing model is capital-intensive and structurally challenged vs fabless AMD outsourcing to TSMC's superior leading-edge process
Risks to watch — AMD
- →MI300X competes with Nvidia's H100 and B200 — Nvidia's CUDA software lock-in makes switching to AMD GPUs very difficult for most AI workloads despite MI300X hardware competitiveness
- →AMD EPYC market share gains face natural limits — as Intel's 18A process potentially recovers, Intel's manufacturing advantage could return
- →Data center segment is now the primary AMD revenue and earnings driver — any slowdown in enterprise server spending impacts AMD significantly
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →