LIVE
KLAC
KLA Corporation · Technology
$259.56
+49.12% this month
VERSUS
⟷
COMPARE
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation · Technology
$389.04
+42.31% this month
Scoreboard verdict
Across AI score, momentum, valuation, upside, operating margin
KLAC
1
LRCX
4
Comparison scoreboard
LRCX LEADS 4/5AI Score
KLAC 39.2
LRCX ✓74.8
1Y Return
KLAC +190.66%
LRCX ✓+319.86%
Fwd P/E
KLAC 50.43
LRCX ✓46.04
Target Up.
KLAC -24.33%
LRCX ✓-11.84%
Op. Margin
KLAC ✓41.22%
LRCX 35.04%
Metrics last refreshed: 6/20/2026
Quick take
KLAC vs LRCX Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
KLA and Lam Research are both critical semiconductor equipment suppliers, but with different roles in the fab: KLA provides process control/inspection equipment used throughout manufacturing, while Lam provides etch and deposition equipment that physically creates device structures. KLA's near-monopoly position provides more consistent margins and less cyclicality; Lam's NAND concentration creates higher exposure to memory spending cycles.
KLAC vs LRCX is a comparison between the most defensive semiconductor equipment supplier (KLA's monopoly process control position) and the most levered etch/deposition equipment supplier to 3D NAND memory scaling (Lam) — KLA offers more stability with premium margins, while Lam offers more cyclical upside when memory capex recovers.
Live analysis · updated 6/20/2026
LRCX holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LRCX leads on both 1-year return (+319.86%) and forward P/E (46.04x vs 50.43x for KLAC), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, LRCX is growing revenue faster (23.80%), while KLAC maintains the higher operating margin (41.22%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for LRCX (-11.84%) than for KLAC (-24.33%).
Normalized 1Y performance
KLAC
LRCX
Recent returns
KLAC
LRCX
Analyst price targets & sentiment
KLAC · 26 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Buy (2.1/5.0)
Price target range
analyst high$900.00
analyst mean$192.62
current price$259.56
-24.3% upside to analyst mean
LRCX · 30 analysts
STRONG BUYHOLDSTRONG SELL
Buy (1.7/5.0)
Price target range
analyst low$70.00
analyst mean$323.38
current price$389.04
-11.8% upside to analyst mean
Who should consider this stock?
KLAC may suit investors who:
- →prefer the most defensible semiconductor equipment position with near-monopoly process control market share
- →value consistently above-60% gross margins from KLA's unique inspection algorithm IP and pricing power
- →want semiconductor equipment exposure with the lowest cyclicality relative to equipment spending cycles
- →are comfortable with China export restriction headwinds in exchange for the most durable semiconductor equipment moat
LRCX may suit investors who:
- →prefer a leading etch and deposition equipment supplier positioned to benefit from 3D NAND layer count growth
- →value the CSBG services revenue (approximately 50% of revenue) providing stable recurring income through spending cycles
- →want higher cyclical upside when NAND memory capex recovers from its historic 2023–2024 downturn
- →are comfortable with more NAND memory concentration than KLA creating larger revenue swings through memory spending cycles
Performance & AI score
| Metric | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 39.2 | 74.8 |
| AI rank | #1179 | #22 |
| Latest close | $259.56 | $389.04 |
| 1M return | +49.12% | +42.31% |
| 6M return | +121.46% | +151.03% |
| 1Y return | +190.66% | +319.86% |
$10,000 invested — hypothetical growth (dividends reinvested)
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $29.79K (+197.9%) started 2025-06-18 | $42.18K (+321.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $136.68K (+1266.8%) started 2021-06-21 | $64.23K (+542.3%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $2.16M (+21535.6%) started 2016-06-20 | $517.51K (+5075.1%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
Valuation & upside potential
| Metric | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $332.5B | $458.72B |
| Trailing P/E | 71.90 | 69.47 |
| Forward P/E | 50.43 | 46.04 |
| Price/Sales | 9.25 | 6.45 |
| EV/Revenue | 25.48 | 21.11 |
| Analyst target | $192.62 | $323.38 |
| Target upside | -24.33% | -11.84% |
Growth, profitability & risk
| Metric | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 11.50% | 23.80% |
| Earnings growth | 11.80% | 40.80% |
| EPS growth | +11.80% | +40.80% |
| FCF margin | +22.07% | +20.07% |
| Operating margin | 41.22% | 35.04% |
| Profit margin | 35.66% | 30.94% |
| ROIC proxy | 94.98% | 66.76% |
| Return on equity | 94.98% | 66.76% |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.28% |
| Beta | 1.50 | 1.87 |
| Debt/equity | 105.40 | 35.28 |
| Current ratio | 3.03 | 2.54 |
| Quick ratio | 1.96 | 1.70 |
Drawdown & downside risk
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
1Y risk snapshot
KLAC max drawdown90.11%
LRCX max drawdown20.10%
KLAC max wkly drop89.95%
LRCX max wkly drop14.78%
5Y risk snapshot
KLAC max drawdown90.11%
LRCX max drawdown56.85%
KLAC max wkly drop89.95%
LRCX max wkly drop18.99%
10Y risk snapshot
KLAC max drawdown90.11%
LRCX max drawdown56.85%
KLAC max wkly drop89.95%
LRCX max wkly drop29.82%
Performance metrics by period
| Period | Metric | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +197.95% | +321.77% |
| CAGR | +198.41% | +322.64% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.01 | 2.90 | |
| Max drawdown | 90.11% | 20.10% | |
| Max daily drop | 89.07% | 9.85% | |
| Max wkly drop | 89.95% | 14.78% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +778.56% | +535.63% |
| CAGR | +54.54% | +44.84% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.51 | 0.93 | |
| Max drawdown | 90.11% | 56.85% | |
| Max daily drop | 89.07% | 11.60% | |
| Max wkly drop | 89.95% | 18.99% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +4028.09% | +4785.76% |
| CAGR | +45.10% | +47.57% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.41 | 0.99 | |
| Max drawdown | 90.11% | 56.85% | |
| Max daily drop | 89.07% | 18.43% | |
| Max wkly drop | 89.95% | 29.82% |
Business comparison
| Category | KLAC | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Company | KLA Corporation | Lam Research Corporation |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials |
| Core business | KLA Corporation is the dominant supplier of process control and inspection equipment for semiconductor manufacturing, providing wafer defect inspection, metrology, and lithography process control systems used after each manufacturing step to catch defects before they propagate. KLA holds 50–55% market share in process control, a near-monopoly reflecting the company's decades of proprietary inspection algorithm IP. Every leading-edge logic and memory fab uses KLA equipment throughout production. | Lam Research is the leading supplier of etch and deposition equipment for semiconductor wafer processing, holding dominant positions in atomic layer deposition (ALD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and plasma etch. Lam's equipment is critical for manufacturing advanced NAND flash memory, DRAM, and leading-edge logic chips. Its installed base of systems generates a significant recurring services revenue stream (CSBG — Customer Support Business Group) that provides stability through equipment spending cycles. |
| Investor focus | Investors track KLA's process control intensity (the percentage of wafer fab equipment spending allocated to inspection/metrology, which rises with each new node), EUV lithography-driven inspection demand, and gross margins that consistently exceed 60%. | Investors focus on NAND flash memory capex recovery (Lam has the highest NAND concentration of any major semiconductor equipment supplier), Logic/foundry capex from TSMC and Intel, CSBG services revenue stability through cycles, and China export restriction impacts. |
KLAC strengths
- →Near-monopoly in process control (50–55% market share) with decades of inspection algorithm IP creating high switching costs
- →Process control spending as a percentage of total WFE rises with each new node — KLA benefits structurally from semiconductor technology complexity
- →Gross margins consistently above 60% reflect the premium pricing power of KLA's unique process control position
LRCX strengths
- →Dominant position in ALD and plasma etch with deep process recipe IP that customers embed into their production process flows
- →CSBG services revenue provides a stable ~50% of total revenue from spare parts, refurbishment, and support regardless of new equipment cycles
- →3D NAND scaling drives etch and deposition intensity per wafer, structurally benefiting Lam as memory stacks increase in layer count
Risks to watch — KLAC
- →Memory semiconductor capex cycles can create sharp revenue swings even though KLA is more defensible than deposition/etch peers
- →China export restrictions have removed significant revenue from Chinese customers, creating a multi-year headwind
- →Emerging competitors (Onto Innovation, Onto Innovation, Hitachi) are trying to win inspection market share, though with limited success to date
Risks to watch — LRCX
- →Higher NAND concentration than KLA creates more volatility tied to memory capex cycles that can reverse sharply
- →China export restrictions have significantly impacted Lam's Chinese memory customer access
- →AMAT and Tokyo Electron compete across deposition categories, reducing the degree of Lam's differentiation versus KLA's near-monopoly in process control
Frequently asked questions
Free public comparison
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.
Related comparisons
More comparisons
Browse all 1,000 comparisons →