ASML vs NVDA Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
ASML (ASML Holding) and NVDA (NVIDIA) are both dominant players in the semiconductor industry with extraordinary monopoly-like competitive positions in their respective niches — ASML is the sole global supplier of EUV lithography machines essential for manufacturing all advanced chips, while NVIDIA dominates AI GPU chip design with 80%+ market share in data center AI training accelerators and the CUDA software ecosystem.
ASML vs NVDA is EUV lithography monopoly enabling all advanced chip manufacturing (ASML's irreplaceable position as the only EUV machine supplier for TSMC/Samsung/Intel, High-NA EUV roadmap extending the monopoly, and strategic geopolitical importance — China export restrictions and semiconductor capex cyclicality) versus AI GPU design dominance with software ecosystem moat (NVIDIA's 80%+ AI training GPU share, CUDA developer lock-in, and Blackwell architecture leadership — hyperscaler custom chip competition risk and valuation multiple compression sensitivity to AI spending deceleration).
NVDA holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. ASML has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+153.36% vs +46.19%), though NVDA trades at the lower forward P/E (16.55x vs 40.20x). NVDA leads on both revenue growth (85.20%) and operating margin (65.60%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NVDA (+41.88%) than for ASML (-10.63%).
- →Want absolute monopoly exposure to semiconductor equipment with 30+ years of technological leadership in EUV lithography that no competitor has been able to replicate
- →Value ASML's strategic role in the entire semiconductor ecosystem — all advanced chips (from NVIDIA GPUs to Apple A-series to AMD CPUs) require ASML EUV equipment, making ASML's monopoly broader than any single chip designer
- →Prefer a more moderate valuation compared to NVIDIA while maintaining exposure to the AI-driven semiconductor capex supercycle through the equipment supplier that enables advanced chip manufacturing
- →Want maximum exposure to the artificial intelligence revolution through the dominant AI chip platform that powers LLM training at Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and thousands of AI startups
- →Believe NVIDIA's CUDA software ecosystem creates durable switching costs that will maintain NVIDIA's GPU dominance even as AMD and hyperscaler custom chips attempt to compete
- →Accept NVIDIA's premium valuation in exchange for the highest growth trajectory among large-cap semiconductor companies during the AI infrastructure investment supercycle
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 65.7 | 86.0 |
| AI rank | #60 | #2 |
| Latest close | $1,929.68 | $210.69 |
| 1M return | +32.22% | -4.50% |
| 6M return | +90.04% | +23.25% |
| 1Y return | +153.36% | +46.19% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $25.34K (+153.4%) started 2025-06-18 | $14.48K (+44.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $28.76K (+187.6%) started 2021-06-18 | $114.8K (+1048.0%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $199.24K (+1892.4%) started 2016-06-20 | $1.84M (+18277.9%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $743.73B | $5.1T |
| Trailing P/E | 64.11 | 32.26 |
| Forward P/E | 40.20 | 16.55 |
| Price/Sales | 9.64 | 23.66 |
| EV/Revenue | 1226.11 | 19.95 |
| Analyst target | $1,724.57 | $298.93 |
| Target upside | -10.63% | +41.88% |
| Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 13.20% | 85.20% |
| Earnings growth | 19.20% | 214.50% |
| EPS growth | +19.20% | +214.50% |
| FCF margin | +24.47% | +18.28% |
| Operating margin | 36.02% | 65.60% |
| Profit margin | 29.71% | 62.97% |
| ROIC proxy | 52.24% | 114.29% |
| Return on equity | 52.24% | 114.29% |
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 0.47% |
| Beta | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Debt/equity | 12.99 | 6.55 |
| Current ratio | 1.36 | 3.44 |
| Quick ratio | 0.69 | 2.14 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +153.36% | +44.82% |
| CAGR | +153.52% | +44.90% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.28 | 1.10 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.85% | 20.22% | |
| Max daily drop | 8.33% | 6.20% | |
| Max wkly drop | 14.28% | 10.72% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +187.55% | +1045.71% |
| CAGR | +23.53% | +62.98% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.61 | 1.12 | |
| Max drawdown | 57.37% | 66.34% | |
| Max daily drop | 16.26% | 16.97% | |
| Max wkly drop | 19.20% | 22.20% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +1892.44% | +17945.12% |
| CAGR | +34.90% | +68.18% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.85 | 1.20 | |
| Max drawdown | 57.37% | 66.34% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.35% | 18.76% | |
| Max wkly drop | 25.42% | 28.36% |
| Category | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Company | ASML Holding N.V. | NVIDIA Corporation |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductor Equipment & Materials | Semiconductors |
| Core business | ASML Holding is a Dutch semiconductor equipment company with a global monopoly on extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines — the critical equipment used by the world's leading chip manufacturers (TSMC, Samsung, Intel Foundry) to pattern the most advanced semiconductor chips at 7nm, 5nm, 3nm, and smaller nodes. ASML's EUV machines are among the most complex machines ever built — each EUV system weighs approximately 180 metric tons, contains over 100,000 parts sourced from hundreds of specialized suppliers worldwide, and costs approximately $150-380 million per machine (ASML's next-generation 'High-NA EUV' systems cost approximately $380 million each). ASML's machine supply chain was decades in development; no competitor has been able to replicate it. ASML also sells DUV (deep ultraviolet) lithography machines for less advanced semiconductor nodes, though EUV represents an increasing share of revenue. | NVIDIA is the dominant designer of graphics processing units (GPUs) and AI accelerators — the chips that power artificial intelligence training, inference, and accelerated computing across data centers, scientific research, and increasingly autonomous vehicles. NVIDIA's GPU architecture (originally developed for computer graphics and gaming) proved uniquely suited to the massively parallel mathematical computations required for deep learning; NVIDIA's H100 and next-generation Blackwell GPU architectures have become the standard platform for training large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Gemini, and Claude. NVIDIA designs chips but does not manufacture them — NVIDIA is a fabless semiconductor company that uses TSMC as its primary manufacturing partner. NVIDIA also sells the CUDA programming platform (which runs on NVIDIA GPUs) as a software ecosystem that creates switching costs for AI researchers and developers. |
| Investor focus | Investors track ASML's EUV shipment volumes and backlog (representing committed future demand), High-NA EUV adoption by leading chip manufacturers, and the overall semiconductor capex cycle driving equipment demand from TSMC, Samsung, and Intel. | Investors track NVIDIA's data center revenue growth (the primary driver of NVIDIA's explosive growth — driven by AI chip demand from hyperscalers), GPU orders and backlog from cloud companies (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta), and potential competition from custom AI chip development by large customers. |
- →Absolute monopoly on EUV lithography — no other company produces EUV systems at commercial scale; TSMC, Samsung, and Intel Foundry all require ASML EUV machines to manufacture the most advanced chips; this monopoly position is protected by ASML's 30+ years of EUV development, patent portfolio, and supply chain that took decades to assemble
- →Next-generation 'High-NA EUV' machines extend ASML's monopoly into the next chip generation — High-NA EUV (high numerical aperture) enables patterning at 2nm and below; ASML is already shipping these $380M systems to Intel and TSMC; no competitor is even close to matching High-NA EUV capability
- →Government strategic importance provides regulatory and financial support — EUV lithography is so strategically important that the Netherlands government (through the Dutch semiconductor ecosystem), the U.S. government, and the European Union all support ASML's market position; export controls on ASML EUV machines to China reflect their geopolitical importance
- →AI GPU market dominance with estimated 80%+ market share in data center AI training chips — NVIDIA's H100 and A100 GPUs are the standard platform for large language model training; the scale of NVIDIA's software ecosystem (CUDA) and hardware install base creates enormous switching costs for AI companies who have built their workflows around NVIDIA
- →CUDA software ecosystem locks in AI researchers and developers — NVIDIA's CUDA programming platform has been the dominant GPU programming environment since 2006; hundreds of thousands of AI researchers and thousands of AI companies have built their entire AI workflow on CUDA; switching to an alternative GPU (AMD ROCm, Intel oneAPI, custom TPUs) requires significant software re-engineering; this creates a software-driven network effect moat
- →Blackwell platform demonstrates continued technology leadership in AI chip generation — NVIDIA's Blackwell GPU architecture (B100, B200, GB200) provides dramatically improved performance per dollar for AI inference; staying two generations ahead of AMD and custom chip alternatives maintains NVIDIA's price premium and market share
- →China export restrictions reduce a significant ASML revenue opportunity — China has been a major buyer of ASML's DUV (non-EUV) systems; U.S. and European export control restrictions on advanced lithography equipment to China limit ASML's access to what would be an enormous market; ASML cannot ship EUV (or now, some advanced DUV) systems to Chinese customers
- →Semiconductor equipment capex cycles create lumpy revenue — semiconductor manufacturers make large capital equipment investments in cycles; during down cycles (when chip demand is weak), capex spending falls and ASML's new equipment orders decline; ASML's backlog provides some buffer but revenue is cyclical
- →Lead times of 18-24 months per machine limit near-term revenue acceleration — ASML's machines require 18-24 months to build after ordering; even with very strong demand, ASML's capacity to ship machines limits near-term revenue growth
- →Hyperscaler custom AI chip development threatens NVIDIA's market share — Google (TPU v5), Amazon (Trainium, Inferentia), Microsoft (Maia), and Meta all have custom AI chip programs designed to reduce NVIDIA GPU dependency; as custom chips mature, hyperscalers may shift a growing share of AI workloads away from NVIDIA GPUs
- →NVIDIA's valuation reflects extraordinary growth expectations that require sustained AI capex growth — NVIDIA trades at extremely high P/E and EV/Sales multiples; if AI capex growth decelerates (if ROI on LLM investments disappoints large customers), NVIDIA's revenue trajectory and stock valuation could compress significantly
- →Export controls on advanced AI chips to China reduce NVIDIA's market — U.S. export controls limit NVIDIA's ability to sell H100 and A100 chips to Chinese customers; NVIDIA sells China-compliant versions (A800, H800) but these restrictions limit a large potential market
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.