TOST vs RSKD Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
TOST (Toast) and RSKD (Riskified) are both fintech/software companies serving the digital commerce ecosystem in different niches — Toast is the dominant restaurant POS and payment platform serving 120,000+ restaurant locations with GPV-linked revenue, while Riskified is an AI fraud prevention company with a unique chargeback guarantee model serving premium e-commerce merchants in luxury, travel, and ticketing.
TOST vs RSKD is dominant restaurant vertical software platform with payment processing flywheel (Toast's comprehensive restaurant management, 120,000+ locations, GPV-linked fintech revenue, and high switching costs — navigating restaurant operator profitability pressures and path to company-level profitability) versus AI-powered e-commerce fraud guarantee specialist with network effect model improvement (Riskified's chargeback guarantee model, luxury/travel/ticketing focus, and transaction data network effects — managing chargeback loss exposure during novel fraud pattern shifts and competing for premium merchant relationships).
RSKD holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. RSKD leads on both 1-year return (+1.76%) and forward P/E quality (14.26x vs 19.43x for TOST), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +5.92% for TOST and +8.24% for RSKD.
- →Want exposure to the restaurant software digitization trend through the dominant U.S. restaurant POS and payment platform with significant switching costs and growing GPV-linked fintech revenue
- →Believe Toast's restaurant management platform (scheduling, inventory, payroll, capital) will continue to expand ARPU as restaurants adopt additional Toast products beyond POS
- →See Toast's large installed base of 120,000+ locations and the substantial population of restaurants still on legacy POS systems as providing a long growth runway for continued location expansion
- →Want exposure to the e-commerce fraud prevention market through a differentiated chargeback guarantee model that aligns vendor incentives with merchant outcomes
- →Believe Riskified's focus on premium luxury, travel, and ticketing merchants provides above-average GMV per merchant and protection from commoditization
- →See the AI/ML transaction data network effect as creating an improving competitive moat as Riskified's approval accuracy improves with more data from its global merchant network
| Metric | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 23.4 | 23.1 |
| AI rank | #3522 | #3683 |
| Latest close | $32.27 | $5.19 |
| 1M return | +12.40% | +3.39% |
| 6M return | +3.80% | +19.59% |
| 1Y return | -33.93% | +1.76% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $6.61K (-33.9%) started 2025-07-31 | $10.18K (+1.8%) started 2025-07-31 |
| 5Y ago | $5.16K (-48.4%) started 2021-09-22 | $1.83K (-81.7%) started 2021-08-02 |
| 10Y ago | $5.16K (-48.4%) started 2021-09-22 | $2K (-80.0%) started 2021-07-29 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $19.02B | $698.46M |
| Trailing P/E | 48.94 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 19.43 | 14.26 |
| Price/Sales | 2.95 | 1.99 |
| EV/Revenue | 2.68 | 1.43 |
| Analyst target | $34.73 | $5.65 |
| Target upside | +5.92% | +8.24% |
| Metric | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 21.90% | 7.10% |
| Earnings growth | 123.00% | N/A |
| EPS growth | +123.00% | N/A |
| FCF margin | +9.12% | +12.35% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 6.39% | -5.17% |
| ROIC proxy | 22.50% | -5.73% |
| Return on equity | 22.50% | -5.73% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Beta | 1.73 | 1.35 |
| Debt/equity | 0.85 | 8.77 |
| Current ratio | 2.44 | 5.55 |
| Quick ratio | 1.79 | 5.34 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -33.93% | +1.76% |
| CAGR | -33.95% | +1.77% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.75 | 0.12 | |
| Max drawdown | 54.71% | 27.95% | |
| Max daily drop | 14.74% | 15.78% | |
| Max wkly drop | 21.48% | 19.85% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -48.38% | -81.67% |
| CAGR | -12.73% | -28.81% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.01 | -0.43 | |
| Max drawdown | 80.56% | 90.17% | |
| Max daily drop | 22.84% | 27.04% | |
| Max wkly drop | 36.74% | 41.46% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -48.38% | -80.04% |
| CAGR | -12.73% | -27.53% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.01 | -0.40 | |
| Max drawdown | 80.56% | 90.17% | |
| Max daily drop | 22.84% | 27.04% | |
| Max wkly drop | 36.74% | 41.46% |
| Category | TOST | RSKD |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Toast, Inc. | Riskified Ltd. |
| Sector | Technology - Restaurant Software & Fintech | Technology - E-Commerce Fraud Prevention |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Toast Inc. develops and sells a comprehensive cloud-based restaurant management platform including point-of-sale (POS) hardware and software, kitchen display systems, online ordering, digital menus, loyalty programs, employee scheduling, inventory management, and restaurant payment processing. Toast serves approximately 120,000+ restaurant locations in the U.S. and Canada across all restaurant segments: quick-service (fast food), fast casual, casual dining, fine dining, and bars/nightclubs. Toast's fintech element is significant — Toast charges payment processing fees on every transaction processed through its platform; as restaurants grow their sales volumes, Toast earns more payment processing revenue; Toast also offers Toast Payroll (restaurant payroll management), Toast Capital (business loans to restaurant operators), and xtraCHEF (restaurant invoice and cost management). | Riskified is an Israeli-American e-commerce fraud prevention company that uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to evaluate whether online purchase transactions are fraudulent or legitimate, in real time. Riskified's unique business model is chargeback guarantee — when Riskified approves a transaction as legitimate, Riskified guarantees to the merchant that the transaction is not fraudulent; if the transaction turns out to be fraudulent (resulting in a chargeback from the customer's bank), Riskified absorbs the financial loss (pays the chargeback amount to the merchant); the merchant pays Riskified a fee (percentage of approved transaction value) in exchange for this guarantee. Riskified's customers include major e-commerce brands in luxury goods, travel, ticketing, consumer electronics, and apparel. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Toast's Gross Payment Volume (GPV, total dollars processed through Toast), location count growth (restaurants using Toast), Average Revenue Per Unit (ARPU, revenue per restaurant), and non-GAAP gross margin trajectory toward profitability. | Investors track Riskified's Gross Merchandise Volume (GMV, the value of transactions reviewed), revenue growth (percentage fee on approved GMV), chargeback loss ratio (Riskified's primary cost), and gross margin (difference between revenue earned and chargebacks paid). |
- →Dominant restaurant vertical software platform with high switching costs — once a restaurant installs Toast hardware and onboards staff to Toast software, switching to a different POS system is extremely disruptive (hardware replacement, data migration, staff retraining); this creates very high switching costs and churn rates consistently below 10%
- →GPV-tied revenue benefits from restaurant sales growth — Toast earns payment processing fees on every dollar restaurants collect; as restaurants grow their sales volumes (through higher check averages, more covers, or higher delivery volumes), Toast's payment revenue grows proportionally without requiring new restaurant locations
- →Restaurant software market is large and underpenetrated — a large majority of U.S. restaurants still use outdated legacy POS systems (NCR Aloha, Oracle Micros) that were not designed for cloud, mobile ordering, or delivery integration; Toast's modern platform offers demonstrably better functionality, creating significant greenfield conversion opportunity
- →Chargeback guarantee model aligns Riskified's incentives with merchant interests — by absorbing chargeback losses when Riskified approves fraud, Riskified has every incentive to accurately identify real fraud; merchants pay for approved transaction value, giving Riskified incentive to approve as many legitimate transactions as possible while accurately blocking fraud
- →AI/ML model improves continuously with more transaction data — Riskified's network of transactions across all its merchant customers provides training data that continuously improves fraud detection accuracy; more transaction data = better model = better performance = more merchant customers = more transaction data; this network effect becomes a competitive moat over time
- →Premium segment focus (luxury, travel, ticketing) protects against commodity fraud prevention competition — Riskified targets merchants selling high-value goods (luxury fashion, airline tickets, concert tickets) where fraud attempts are sophisticated and where declining legitimate transactions is costly; these premium merchants are willing to pay more for high-accuracy fraud prevention
- →Restaurant industry is facing cost pressures from labor inflation and food costs — many restaurant operators are struggling with margin compression; labor cost increases reduce restaurants' cash flow, potentially leading to closures that are customer churn for Toast
- →Competition from Square (Block's restaurant software), Lightspeed Restaurant, and Olo for delivery integration — while Toast has significant market share, several well-funded competitors are expanding restaurant software capabilities; Google's Toast investment also signals the competitive interest in the segment
- →Hardware dependency creates margin limitations — Toast's POS terminals, kitchen display systems, and card readers are manufactured and sold at low margins (or subsidized); hardware gross margins drag on overall company gross margin; the financial model requires growing high-margin software and fintech revenue faster than hardware to improve overall gross margins
- →Riskified bears the financial loss when its AI misidentifies legitimate transactions as fraudulent — when Riskified wrongly approves a fraudulent transaction, it must pay the chargeback; if fraud patterns shift rapidly (new fraud techniques emerge), Riskified's model accuracy may temporarily fall before adapting, creating chargeback loss spikes
- →E-commerce growth rate normalization post-COVID reduces GMV growth tailwind — Riskified's revenue grows with e-commerce GMV; the COVID e-commerce surge was exceptional; as e-commerce growth normalizes, Riskified's GMV growth rate moderates
- →Competition from Forter (direct competitor, private), Signifyd, Kount (Equifax), and card network fraud tools — Riskified competes with other chargeback guarantee fraud prevention companies; well-funded competitors like Forter target the same premium merchant segments; differentiation requires continuously maintaining superior model accuracy
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.