BDX vs ABT Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
BDX and ABT are both healthcare conglomerate dividend royalty with 50+ consecutive dividend increase streaks. BDX is a more focused medical supplies/diagnostics/interventional company with dominant syringe market share and Bard acquisition leverage. ABT is more diversified across medical devices (Libre CGM — a blockbuster growth product), diagnostics, nutrition, and pharmaceuticals. ABT offers higher growth potential from Libre's expansion; BDX offers consistent cash generation from essential medical consumables.
BDX vs ABT — Becton Dickinson (dominant global syringe manufacturer and medical diagnostics company with 50+ year dividend growth history, recovering from Bard acquisition leverage) versus Abbott Laboratories (diversified healthcare conglomerate with FreeStyle Libre CGM as a blockbuster growth product, cardiac device leadership, and Dividend King status).
BDX holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. BDX leads on both 1-year return (-15.28%) and forward P/E (10.75x vs 14.59x for ABT), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, ABT is growing revenue faster (7.80%), while BDX maintains the higher operating margin (14.74%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for ABT (+31.82%) than for BDX (+25.50%).
- →want exposure to essential medical consumables with 35-40% global syringe market share — recession-resistant volume demand regardless of economic cycle
- →value Dividend King status and 50+ consecutive years of dividend growth as a signal of exceptional financial durability and shareholder commitment
- →are comfortable with slower organic growth in exchange for highly predictable consumable revenue — BD's syringes and diagnostics consumables generate consistent cash flow
- →believe BD's Bard acquisition leverage is manageable and debt paydown will unlock improved capital allocation for buybacks and increased dividends going forward
- →want exposure to FreeStyle Libre's continued global expansion — the CGM market is in early innings with massive non-diabetic wellness monitoring TAM expansion potential
- →prefer ABT's four-segment diversification (devices, diagnostics, nutrition, pharma) providing revenue stability across healthcare spending cycles
- →value Abbott's cardiac device pipeline (electrophysiology, structural heart) as a second major growth driver alongside Libre
- →are comfortable with post-COVID diagnostics normalization headwind and want to own the long-term growth drivers embedded in Abbott's 100-year healthcare franchise
| Metric | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 39.7 | 48.8 |
| AI rank | #1135 | #541 |
| Latest close | $143.98 | $88.41 |
| 1M return | -2.02% | -0.46% |
| 6M return | -26.30% | -30.23% |
| 1Y return | -15.28% | -33.16% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $8.54K (-14.6%) started 2025-06-18 | $6.68K (-33.2%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $6.87K (-31.3%) started 2021-06-21 | $9.22K (-7.8%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $11.37K (+13.7%) started 2016-06-20 | $33.17K (+231.7%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $39.67B | $153.99B |
| Trailing P/E | 25.13 | 24.76 |
| Forward P/E | 10.75 | 14.59 |
| Price/Sales | N/A | 5.49 |
| EV/Revenue | 2.53 | 4.02 |
| Analyst target | $180.69 | $116.54 |
| Target upside | +25.50% | +31.82% |
| Metric | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 5.20% | 7.80% |
| Earnings growth | 28.60% | -19.70% |
| EPS growth | +28.60% | -19.70% |
| FCF margin | +20.39% | +14.05% |
| Operating margin | 14.74% | 13.47% |
| Profit margin | 5.12% | 13.90% |
| ROIC proxy | 6.67% | 12.33% |
| Return on equity | 6.67% | 12.33% |
| Dividend yield | 2.92% | 2.85% |
| Beta | 0.28 | 0.62 |
| Debt/equity | 71.60 | 64.77 |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | 1.39 |
| Quick ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -14.60% | -33.23% |
| CAGR | -14.62% | -33.27% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.52 | -1.70 | |
| Max drawdown | 32.57% | 40.21% | |
| Max daily drop | 17.22% | 10.04% | |
| Max wkly drop | 16.86% | 13.11% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -35.14% | -14.60% |
| CAGR | -8.31% | -3.11% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.41 | -0.24 | |
| Max drawdown | 48.60% | 40.85% | |
| Max daily drop | 18.13% | 10.04% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.00% | 13.11% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -0.45% | +176.78% |
| CAGR | -0.04% | +10.72% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.07 | 0.36 | |
| Max drawdown | 48.60% | 40.85% | |
| Max daily drop | 18.13% | 10.04% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.00% | 16.72% |
| Category | BDX | ABT |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Becton, Dickinson and Company | Abbott Laboratories |
| Sector | Healthcare | Healthcare |
| Industry | N/A | Medical Devices |
| Core business | Becton Dickinson is a global medical technology company operating in three segments: BD Medical (medication delivery — syringes, infusion systems, medication management), BD Diagnostics (specimen collection, lab automation, microbiology testing), and BD Interventional (surgical devices for oncology, ophthalmology, peripheral vascular). BD is the world's largest manufacturer of syringes — a dominant position in consumable medical supplies with high recurring revenue. BD has pursued acquisitions (Bard in 2017 for $24B) that increased leverage, requiring ongoing debt reduction. | Abbott is a diversified healthcare company with four segments: Medical Devices (cardiac rhythm management, electrophysiology, neuromodulation, structural heart — Abbott's fastest-growing segment with Libre continuous glucose monitors and heart valves), Diagnostics (COVID tests drove massive revenue surge, now normalizing; molecular, immunoassay testing), Nutrition (Ensure, Pedialyte, Similac — consumer health nutrition), and Established Pharmaceuticals (brand drugs in emerging markets). Abbott's FreeStyle Libre continuous glucose monitor (CGM) is the fastest-growing medical device product globally. |
| Investor focus | Investors focus on BD's Bard acquisition debt paydown progress, margin improvement from operational efficiency, new product launches in oncology and infection prevention, and consistent dividend growth (BD has raised dividends 50+ consecutive years — Dividend King status). | Investors focus on Abbott's FreeStyle Libre CGM growth trajectory (the dominant CGM globally and growing into non-diabetic wellness monitoring), cardiac device pipeline (electrophysiology, structural heart), post-COVID diagnostics revenue normalization, and dividend growth history. |
- →Dominant global syringe manufacturer: BD makes 35-40% of the world's syringes — irreplaceable healthcare infrastructure with consistent volume demand regardless of economic conditions
- →Dividend King with 50+ consecutive increases: BD's incredibly long dividend growth streak reflects financial durability and shareholder commitment across multiple recessions and healthcare cycles
- →High recurring consumable revenue: 70%+ of BD revenue is consumables — syringes, reagents, collection tubes used once and repurchased — creating highly predictable revenue streams
- →FreeStyle Libre CGM: the world's most prescribed CGM with 6M+ users globally — 20%+ annual growth from diabetic care and expanding into non-diabetic performance/wellness monitoring (massive TAM expansion)
- →Diversified four-segment business: medical devices, diagnostics, nutrition, and pharmaceuticals provide revenue stability — no single segment dominates or creates catastrophic concentration risk
- →Dividend Aristocrat with 50+ consecutive increases (Dividend King status): ABT split off AbbVie in 2013 and the combined Abbott + AbbVie dividend track record maintains Dividend King history
- →Bard acquisition leverage: BD took on significant debt for the 2017 Bard acquisition — ongoing debt paydown constrains capital allocation flexibility vs peers
- →Organic growth below med-device peers: BD's large size and consumable focus means slower organic growth than higher-growth med-tech companies — more steady but less exciting growth profile
- →Regulatory recall risk: BD has had medical device recalls historically — quality and regulatory compliance is an ongoing operational risk at their manufacturing scale
- →Post-COVID diagnostics revenue normalization: COVID testing created $8B+ in testing revenue that has largely disappeared — underlying diagnostics growth must absorb the decline
- →Libre competition from Dexcom: DexCom and Medtronic compete directly for CGM market share — Libre's dominance isn't guaranteed as competitors improve product offerings
- →Nutrition segment margin pressure: infant formula supply chain disruptions (2022 Similac plant closure) and commodity costs affect nutrition segment margins unpredictably
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.