CE vs LYB Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
CE (Celanese) and LYB (LyondellBasell) are both global chemical manufacturers but with fundamentally different chemical economics — Celanese is a specialty chemical compounder focusing on high-performance engineered polymers and the acetyl chain with technology-based pricing power, while LyondellBasell is a commodity polymer giant with scale-based cost advantages in polyethylene and polypropylene manufacturing subject to commodity price cycles.
CE vs LYB is specialty chemical technology-driven compounder with automotive electrification and engineered polymer tailwinds (Celanese's DuPont M&M expanded portfolio, acetyl chain cost leadership, and EV-driven engineering polymer demand — managing high leverage from acquisition financing) versus low-cost commodity polymer manufacturer benefiting from U.S. shale gas cost advantage and technology licensing (LyondellBasell's Gulf Coast PE/PP cost leadership, polyolefin cycle exposure, and technology licensing recurring income — cyclical profitability with consistent dividend capital return) — specialty polymer value-add versus commodity chemical scale.
CE holds the edge across 3 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. LYB has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+0.81% vs -5.94%), though CE trades at the lower forward P/E (7.72x vs 7.98x). CE leads on both revenue growth (-2.20%) and operating margin (8.47%), suggesting a stronger fundamental setup on both dimensions. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for CE (+45.74%) than for LYB (+33.77%).
- →Believe the DuPont Mobility & Materials acquisition significantly expands Celanese's addressable market in automotive electrification engineering polymers where demand is secular rather than cyclical
- →See Celanese's acetyl chain cost leadership as providing a stable cash flow base to service acquisition debt while the engineered materials segment grows
- →Are willing to accept high leverage risk from the DuPont M&M acquisition in exchange for an expanded specialty chemical portfolio at what may be an attractive entry valuation
- →Seek commodity chemical exposure with the lowest-cost producer advantage — LYB's U.S. shale gas feedstock cost advantage makes it the most competitive PE/PP producer globally in a commodity market where cost is the primary competitive variable
- →Value LYB's substantial dividend (5-9% yield) as a primary return mechanism, accepting that the dividend varies with the polymer pricing cycle
- →Want technology licensing recurring income from LYB's polyolefin process technology business as a non-cyclical, high-margin revenue stream alongside the manufacturing operations
| Metric | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 26.7 | 40.4 |
| AI rank | #2564 | #1059 |
| Latest close | $51.16 | $60.07 |
| 1M return | -4.36% | -17.76% |
| 6M return | +23.07% | +37.27% |
| 1Y return | -5.94% | +0.81% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $9.41K (-5.9%) started 2025-06-18 | $10.24K (+2.4%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $3.49K (-65.1%) started 2021-06-18 | $9.83K (-1.7%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $7.33K (-26.7%) started 2016-06-20 | $21.81K (+118.1%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $5.61B | $19.39B |
| Trailing P/E | N/A | 98.77 |
| Forward P/E | 7.72 | 7.98 |
| Price/Sales | N/A | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 1.81 | 1.05 |
| Analyst target | $74.56 | $80.35 |
| Target upside | +45.74% | +33.77% |
| Metric | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -2.20% | -6.30% |
| Earnings growth | 28.20% | -29.50% |
| EPS growth | +28.20% | -29.50% |
| FCF margin | +10.77% | +3.33% |
| Operating margin | 8.47% | 3.47% |
| Profit margin | -11.56% | -2.69% |
| ROIC proxy | -21.11% | -6.01% |
| Return on equity | -21.11% | -6.01% |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 6.86% |
| Beta | 0.74 | 0.33 |
| Debt/equity | 287.74 | 141.24 |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 1.54 |
| Quick ratio | 0.80 | 0.82 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | -5.94% | +2.44% |
| CAGR | -5.94% | +2.44% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.09 | 0.19 | |
| Max drawdown | 43.05% | 37.10% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.07% | 11.98% | |
| Max wkly drop | 17.43% | 19.05% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -65.07% | -25.34% |
| CAGR | -18.97% | -5.69% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.34 | -0.15 | |
| Max drawdown | 79.56% | 57.55% | |
| Max daily drop | 26.32% | 11.98% | |
| Max wkly drop | 36.35% | 24.00% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -26.74% | +20.58% |
| CAGR | -3.07% | +1.89% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.01 | 0.11 | |
| Max drawdown | 79.56% | 68.17% | |
| Max daily drop | 26.32% | 25.49% | |
| Max wkly drop | 36.35% | 41.45% |
| Category | CE | LYB |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Celanese Corporation | LyondellBasell Industries N.V. |
| Sector | Basic Materials | Basic Materials |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Celanese Corporation is a global specialty chemicals manufacturer operating in two segments: Engineered Materials (technical polymers — Celcon acetal polymers, Fortron polyphenylene sulfide, Hostaform POM — sold to automotive, electronics, medical, and industrial manufacturers for precision components requiring high heat resistance, chemical resistance, or mechanical performance) and Acetyl Chain (acetic acid, vinyl acetate monomer (VAM), ethyl acetate, and acetic anhydride — large-volume chemical intermediates used in paints, adhesives, food additives, and pharmaceutical manufacturing). Celanese's Engineered Materials business benefited significantly from the 2023 acquisition of DuPont's Mobility & Materials segment, dramatically expanding Celanese's engineering polymer portfolio for automotive electrification applications. | LyondellBasell is one of the world's largest chemical companies, specializing in polyolefin polymers (polyethylene and polypropylene — the world's most widely used plastics), polystyrene, and refining operations. LYB's segments: Olefins and Polyolefins Americas (ethylene cracking and polyethylene/polypropylene production in the U.S. Gulf Coast), Olefins and Polyolefins Europe/Asia/International (similar operations in Europe, Asia, and globally), Intermediates and Derivatives (oxyfuels like MTBE used to improve gasoline octane; propylene oxide and derivatives for polyurethane foam; acetyls), Refining (Houston refinery processing crude into fuels), and Technology (licensing proprietary polyethylene and polypropylene process technology to third-party manufacturers globally). |
| Investor focus | Investors track Celanese's segment-level EBITDA margins (Engineered Materials at higher specialty margins; Acetyl Chain at more commodity-like margins), integration progress on the DuPont M&M acquisition, automotive end-market demand (a major driver of engineered polymer demand), and leverage reduction. | Investors track LYB's polyethylene and polypropylene spreads (polymer price minus feedstock ethylene price — the key profitability driver), utilization rates, refining margins, the Technology segment licensing revenue, and the dividend (LYB pays a substantial recurring and supplemental dividend). |
- →Engineered materials portfolio serves automotive electrification with proprietary high-performance polymers — electric vehicles require more engineering polymers per vehicle than ICE vehicles (battery housings, thermal management, electrical connectors require high-performance materials); Celanese's Celcon, Fortron, and DuPont-acquired polyamide and thermoplastic elastomer products are designed for these demanding applications
- →Acetyl chain provides stable cash flow with global cost leadership — Celanese operates the most cost-competitive methanol-to-acetic-acid process globally; acetic acid is a large-volume chemical used in virtually every industry; cost leadership in a commodity chemical provides stable margins
- →DuPont Mobility & Materials acquisition dramatically expanded Celanese's engineered polymer portfolio — adding polyamides (nylon), thermoplastic elastomers (Hytrel, Crastin), and specialty resins to Celanese's existing acetal and PPS portfolio; the combined portfolio is one of the broadest engineering polymer offerings globally
- →LYB is among the world's lowest-cost polyethylene producers — U.S. Gulf Coast crackers using cheap shale gas ethane feedstock produce ethylene at costs 30-50% below naphtha-based European or Asian competitors; LYB's U.S. cracker fleet gives it structural cost competitiveness
- →Technology licensing segment generates high-margin recurring income — LYB licenses its Spheripol, Spherizone, and Hostalen polyolefin process technologies to chemical companies worldwide; licensing fees are recurring and high-margin; the technology business is relatively non-cyclical versus the manufacturing businesses
- →Dividend culture provides consistent capital return to shareholders — LYB has historically returned substantial capital via a quarterly base dividend plus supplemental dividends or share repurchases in high-margin years; the yield on LYB shares is typically 5-9%
- →Heavy leverage from DuPont M&M acquisition constrains financial flexibility — the acquisition added approximately $10B+ in debt; leverage reduction is a multi-year priority that limits share repurchases, acquisitions, and dividend growth
- →Automotive end-market cyclicality and EV transition uncertainty create demand volatility — auto production volumes fluctuate with economic cycles; EV adoption uncertainty creates demand mix uncertainty within automotive
- →Acetyl chain margins are subject to supply/demand cycles — when acetic acid oversupply occurs (Chinese capacity additions), margins compress; Celanese must accept acetyl chain cyclicality as a structural feature of that segment
- →Polyolefin pricing is highly cyclical with commodity market exposure — PE and PP prices collapse in oversupply cycles (Chinese capacity additions have created periodic global oversupply) and spike in tight markets; LYB's profitability can swing dramatically between cycles
- →U.S.-China polyethylene trade dynamics create uncertainty — LYB's U.S. Gulf Coast capacity produces a significant PE surplus that is exported globally; trade policy changes, Chinese capacity additions, and anti-dumping duties in export markets can affect LYB's export pricing
- →Houston refinery is a stranded asset in the energy transition — the refinery produces petroleum fuels; in a carbon-reduction environment, refining economics deteriorate as fuel demand declines; LYB has been evaluating strategic alternatives for the refinery
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.