NVGS vs FLNG Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
NVGS (Navigator Gas) and FLNG (Flex LNG) are both liquefied gas shipping companies but serving different cargo markets — Navigator transports petrochemical gases (ethylene, propylene, ammonia) and LPG using flexible semi-refrigerated vessels across shorter trade routes, while Flex LNG transports LNG exclusively using modern, fuel-efficient LNG carriers on long-term time charters to energy companies.
NVGS vs FLNG is specialized petrochemical gas carrier with flexible multi-cargo vessels (Navigator Gas's semi-refrigerated fleet serving ethylene, propylene, ammonia, and LPG trades — cargo flexibility and Houston terminal providing diversification across petrochemical shipping cycles) versus modern LNG tanker fleet on long-term charters to energy majors (Flex LNG's 13 M-type and X-DF vessels, high time charter coverage, and John Fredriksen sponsorship — concentrated LNG trade exposure with visibility from multi-year charter backlog) — petrochemical gas flexibility versus LNG trade growth leverage.
NVGS holds the edge across 4 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. NVGS leads on both 1-year return (+51.07%) and forward P/E (12.48x vs 13.85x for FLNG), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for NVGS (+16.31%) than for FLNG (-12.84%).
- →Want exposure to petrochemical gas shipping with cargo flexibility (ethylene, propylene, ammonia, LPG) that allows Navigator to capture rates across multiple specialized trade routes
- →Value Navigator's Houston Ship Channel terminal as providing infrastructure revenue and strategic positioning in the world's largest petrochemical hub
- →See the semi-refrigerated specialized fleet as competing in a smaller, less-commoditized market than large-scale LPG/LNG carriers with better supply/demand dynamics
- →Want exposure to the structural LNG trade growth driven by U.S. LNG export expansion and Asian energy demand with a modern fleet that commands fuel-efficiency premiums
- →Value Flex LNG's long-term time charter coverage as providing earnings visibility and dividend sustainability through LNG spot rate volatility
- →Appreciate John Fredriksen's shipping industry pedigree as providing strategic relationships with energy majors and commodity traders who are the primary LNG vessel charterers
| Metric | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 34.3 | 30.9 |
| AI rank | #1748 | #2214 |
| Latest close | $21.71 | $29.74 |
| 1M return | -8.90% | -6.38% |
| 6M return | +26.49% | +23.09% |
| 1Y return | +51.07% | +35.98% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $15.32K (+53.2%) started 2025-06-18 | $15.25K (+52.5%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $22.13K (+121.3%) started 2021-06-18 | $84.43K (+744.3%) started 2021-06-18 |
| 10Y ago | $20.42K (+104.2%) started 2016-06-20 | $144.32K (+1343.2%) started 2019-06-17 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.34B | $1.61B |
| Trailing P/E | 13.40 | 21.40 |
| Forward P/E | 12.48 | 13.85 |
| Price/Sales | 2.33 | 4.74 |
| EV/Revenue | 3.76 | 9.02 |
| Analyst target | $25.25 | $25.92 |
| Target upside | +16.31% | -12.84% |
| Metric | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -7.10% | -9.00% |
| Earnings growth | 38.60% | 4.00% |
| EPS growth | +38.60% | +4.00% |
| FCF margin | +21.47% | +29.68% |
| Operating margin | N/A | N/A |
| Profit margin | 18.84% | 22.26% |
| ROIC proxy | 9.10% | 10.20% |
| Return on equity | 9.10% | 10.20% |
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | 9.94% |
| Beta | 0.47 | 0.17 |
| Debt/equity | 73.64 | 260.81 |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 2.72 |
| Quick ratio | 0.84 | 2.26 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +51.07% | +35.98% |
| CAGR | +51.12% | +36.01% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.46 | 1.15 | |
| Max drawdown | 15.15% | 10.29% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.55% | 5.65% | |
| Max wkly drop | 13.61% | 7.76% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +112.42% | +277.94% |
| CAGR | +16.26% | +30.47% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.48 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdown | 38.88% | 31.04% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.55% | 11.30% | |
| Max wkly drop | 20.00% | 27.71% | |
| 10Y | Growth | +96.02% | +432.83% |
| CAGR | +6.97% | +26.98% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | 0.64 | |
| Max drawdown | 73.33% | 71.92% | |
| Max daily drop | 24.37% | 13.09% | |
| Max wkly drop | 50.89% | 27.71% |
| Category | NVGS | FLNG |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Navigator Gas Holdings plc | Flex LNG Ltd. |
| Sector | Energy - Petrochemical Gas Shipping / LPG Carriers | Energy - LNG Shipping |
| Industry | N/A | N/A |
| Core business | Navigator Gas is a specialist owner and operator of liquefied gas carriers transporting petrochemical gases and LPG. Navigator's fleet of approximately 50+ vessels includes semi-refrigerated carriers (which transport ethylene, propylene, butadiene, ammonia, and LPG at partial refrigeration and pressure — highly flexible vessels that can carry multiple cargo types), fully pressurized carriers (LPG and chemical gas at ambient temperature but high pressure), and ethane carriers (purpose-built for ethylene and ethane transport). Navigator's fleet is differentiated from large-scale LPG carriers (VLGCs — Very Large Gas Carriers used for propane/butane trade) by its focus on petrochemical gas cargoes and its use of medium-size semi-refrigerated vessels. Navigator also operates a terminal on the Houston Ship Channel. | Flex LNG is a modern LNG (liquefied natural gas) tanker owner/operator with a fleet of 13 M-type Electronically Controlled Gas Injection (MEGA) TFDE (Tri-Fuel Diesel Electric) and X-DF (two-stroke dual-fuel) LNG carriers. Flex LNG's vessels are among the most modern and fuel-efficient in the LNG fleet, built at South Korean shipyards (Hyundai Heavy Industries, Samsung). Flex LNG charters its vessels to LNG producers (Shell, BP, Equinor, Glencore) and utilities under long-term time charters (3-7 years) that provide revenue certainty. Flex LNG is backed by John Fredriksen (the Norwegian shipping magnate who founded Frontline and Seadrill), who provides strategic sponsorship and financial backing. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Navigator's fleet utilization rates, time charter equivalent (TCE) earnings per vessel per day, contract coverage (% of fleet locked into time charters vs. spot market), and the petrochemical gas market supply/demand balance. | Investors track Flex LNG's TCE per vessel per day, contract backlog coverage (percentage of fleet on time charters vs. spot), dividend sustainability, and the long-term LNG trade growth that drives vessel demand. |
- →Semi-refrigerated vessels are the most flexible in the liquefied gas fleet — semi-refrigerated/fully pressurized carriers can transport ethylene, propylene, butadiene, ammonia, propane, butane, and other gases in the same vessel; this cargo flexibility allows Navigator to optimize vessel deployment across diverse trade routes
- →Petrochemical gas shipping is more specialized with fewer competitors than large-scale LPG/LNG — the semi-refrigerated segment has a limited number of capable vessels and operators; fewer vessels competing for the same cargoes supports rates better than commodity VLGC markets
- →Houston Ship Channel terminal provides infrastructure revenue and cargo positioning — Navigator's terminal allows transshipment and storage of petrochemical gases, supporting customer supply chains in the U.S. Gulf Coast petrochemical hub
- →Modern, fuel-efficient fleet commands premium rates vs. older LNG vessels — Flex LNG's M-type and X-DF vessels are more fuel-efficient than older steam turbine LNG carriers; charterers prefer modern vessels because lower fuel consumption reduces voyage costs; this premium efficiency supports higher TCE rates
- →Long-term time charter coverage provides earnings visibility — Flex LNG targets securing 80%+ of its fleet on multi-year time charters; the backlog of contracted revenue reduces exposure to spot LNG tanker rate volatility
- →John Fredriksen sponsorship provides strategic credibility and financial backing — Fredriksen's shipping empire (Frontline, Euronav, SFL Corporation) has deep relationships with oil majors and commodity traders who are LNG charterers; Fredriksen-backed shipping companies have historically had better access to vessels and charterers than independent operators
- →Petrochemical trade volumes depend on global chemical production and trade flows — if chemical production in Asia or Europe declines, demand for petrochemical gas shipping declines proportionally; chemical cycle downturns reduce volumes
- →Semi-refrigerated vessel newbuild orders could create oversupply — if shipyards receive orders for many new semi-refrigerated vessels, fleet supply growth could outpace cargo volume growth and compress TCE rates
- →LPG/petrochemical gas trade patterns can shift with geopolitical events — U.S. ethane exports to Europe (via ethane carriers) depend on European cracker economics relative to naphtha; shifts in energy trade patterns affect Navigator's cargo mix
- →LNG tanker rates are cyclical and depend on LNG trade growth vs. newbuild vessel supply — the LNG carrier fleet is growing as shipyards deliver vessels ordered during the LNG boom; if vessel supply exceeds cargo volume growth, spot rates decline; this affects vessel values and the rates at which time charters are reset
- →Long-term time charter expirations create rechartering risk — when Flex LNG's existing time charters expire (3-7 year term), vessels must be rechartered; if market rates at that time are below current charter rates, earnings decline; Flex LNG must continuously renew charters in an uncertain rate environment
- →LNG carrier concentration in a single cargo type limits vessel flexibility vs. semi-refrigerated multipurpose carriers — LNG carriers are purpose-built for LNG; they cannot carry other cargoes if LNG trade declines; vessel value is entirely dependent on LNG trade volumes
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.