SLB vs HAL Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
SLB and HAL are the two dominant global oilfield services companies serving oil and gas E&P operators, but with different geographic mixes and service portfolios — SLB is more internationally focused with technology-intensive reservoir characterization and a growing digital platform, while Halliburton dominates North America completion services (hydraulic fracturing) with higher relative exposure to U.S. shale activity cycles.
SLB vs HAL is international technology-intensive oilfield services with digital platform (SLB's global reservoir characterization and DELFI E&P digital platform serving national oil companies and international E&P in the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific at premium technology margins) versus North America completion services leader with international expansion ambitions (Halliburton's hydraulic fracturing dominance in U.S. shale with higher oil price beta and growing international completion services) — international technology services versus North America completion leverage.
HAL holds the edge across 5 of 5 key metrics in this comparison. HAL leads on both 1-year return (+51.80%) and forward P/E (13.55x vs 16.80x for SLB), a relatively favorable combination of momentum and valuation. On fundamentals, SLB is growing revenue faster (2.70%), while HAL maintains the higher operating margin (12.57%) — a classic growth-versus-profitability split. Analyst consensus implies similar upside for both: +11.00% for SLB and +11.72% for HAL.
- →Want the international oilfield services leader with technology differentiation — SLB's global reach and proprietary reservoir characterization and digital technology generates higher margins and more defensible market position in international markets
- →Value SLB's DELFI digital platform as a path to higher-margin recurring software revenue that diversifies beyond cyclical drilling activity
- →Prefer SLB's lower North America concentration as providing more stable margins through the U.S. shale activity cycle versus Halliburton's higher shale exposure
- →Want maximum leverage to North America shale activity — Halliburton's dominant frac market position amplifies both the upside of active U.S. drilling campaigns and the downside of activity slowdowns
- →Value Halliburton's hydraulic fracturing technology and market position as a structural advantage in completion services where the company has been the clear market leader for decades
- →Believe international completion services growth will reduce Halliburton's North America cyclicality while its dominant U.S. frac position sustains margins through oil price cycles
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 28.7 | 42.3 |
| AI rank | #2407 | #868 |
| Latest close | $48.09 | $34.93 |
| 1M return | -15.29% | -18.73% |
| 6M return | +24.81% | +25.92% |
| 1Y return | +33.29% | +51.80% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $13.41K (+34.1%) started 2025-06-18 | $15.68K (+56.8%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $16.9K (+69.0%) started 2021-06-21 | $17.04K (+70.4%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $10.48K (+4.8%) started 2016-06-20 | $11.18K (+11.8%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $83.99B | $33.08B |
| Trailing P/E | 24.75 | 21.88 |
| Forward P/E | 16.80 | 13.55 |
| Price/Sales | 1.27 | N/A |
| EV/Revenue | 2.60 | 1.77 |
| Analyst target | $62.36 | $44.24 |
| Target upside | +11.00% | +11.72% |
| Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | 2.70% | -0.30% |
| Earnings growth | -13.80% | 133.50% |
| EPS growth | -13.80% | +133.50% |
| FCF margin | +8.47% | +9.14% |
| Operating margin | 12.27% | 12.57% |
| Profit margin | 9.26% | 6.95% |
| ROIC proxy | 14.07% | 14.63% |
| Return on equity | 14.07% | 14.63% |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 1.72% |
| Beta | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| Debt/equity | 42.52 | 74.65 |
| Current ratio | 1.34 | 2.08 |
| Quick ratio | 0.87 | 1.30 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +34.14% | +56.78% |
| CAGR | +34.20% | +56.88% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.90 | 1.29 | |
| Max drawdown | 17.10% | 18.73% | |
| Max daily drop | 7.49% | 6.78% | |
| Max wkly drop | 14.12% | 12.15% | |
| 5Y | Growth | +56.41% | +59.46% |
| CAGR | +9.37% | +9.80% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.31 | 0.32 | |
| Max drawdown | 47.02% | 54.01% | |
| Max daily drop | 11.60% | 12.88% | |
| Max wkly drop | 24.29% | 24.62% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -20.69% | -6.24% |
| CAGR | -2.29% | -0.64% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.04 | 0.12 | |
| Max drawdown | 84.29% | 91.45% | |
| Max daily drop | 27.42% | 37.64% | |
| Max wkly drop | 44.17% | 56.45% |
| Category | SLB | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Company | SLB (formerly Schlumberger Limited) | Halliburton Company |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | N/A |
| Core business | SLB is the world's largest oilfield services company — providing technology-intensive services across the oil and gas exploration and production lifecycle: reservoir characterization (seismic acquisition, interpretation, reservoir modeling), drilling services (directional drilling, drill bits, measurement-while-drilling), production services (well completions, artificial lift, surface equipment), and digital/technology solutions (DELFI cognitive E&P platform, data analytics, AI for reservoir optimization). SLB operates in 120+ countries with particular strength in international markets (Middle East, North Africa, Latin America, Asia-Pacific). | Halliburton is the second-largest oilfield services company globally with particular dominance in North American completion services — specifically hydraulic fracturing (pressure pumping) for unconventional oil and gas (shale). Halliburton's two business segments are Completion and Production (cementing, stimulation, production chemicals, artificial lift) and Drilling and Evaluation (directional drilling, drill bits, well logging). Halliburton is the global leader in hydraulic fracturing, with North America representing approximately 40-45% of revenue. |
| Investor focus | Investors track SLB's international revenue growth (Middle East and Asia-Pacific are high-growth regions), digital and technology services revenue mix (higher-margin, more durable than commodity services), margin expansion trajectory, and the multi-year offshore and international drilling upcycle driven by underinvestment during the 2015-2021 downturn. | Investors track North America completion activity (horizontal rig count, frac crew utilization, frac sand volumes), international revenue growth as Halliburton expands beyond its North America concentration, margin performance in completion services, and oil price sensitivity of the North America shale market. |
- →International market leadership in higher-margin reservoir characterization and digital services — SLB's global footprint and proprietary technology in seismic interpretation, reservoir simulation, and drilling optimization gives it pricing power versus smaller regional competitors in international markets
- →Digital platform (DELFI) creating recurring software revenue — SLB's cognitive E&P platform provides AI-powered reservoir modeling, production optimization, and data analytics; digital services generate higher-margin, recurring subscription revenue less tied to drilling activity
- →Multi-year international drilling upcycle creates favorable demand environment — underinvestment in international E&P during 2015-2021 created supply deficits; national oil companies and international E&P companies are increasing spending to sustain or grow production, benefiting SLB's international service revenue
- →North America hydraulic fracturing market leadership — Halliburton is the global leader in pressure pumping (hydraulic fracturing), which is the most widely-used completion technique for unconventional oil and gas (the method that enabled the U.S. shale revolution); this dominant position provides strong pricing and utilization in U.S. frac markets
- →iCruise and LOGIX autonomous drilling differentiation — Halliburton's intelligent drilling systems enable automated directional drilling, reducing well cost and improving precision in shale plays where consistent horizontal well placement is critical
- →International expansion diversifies North America cyclicality — Halliburton has been growing its international completion services business, which should reduce its relative dependence on North America's more volatile shale activity
- →Oil price cycle risk — oilfield services demand is highly correlated to oil prices; a sustained decline in oil prices causes E&P companies to cut capital budgets, directly reducing demand for SLB's services
- →North America market share versus Halliburton — Halliburton has historically dominated North America pressure pumping and completion services; SLB has less market share in the key U.S. shale market that drives oilfield services cycles
- →Execution in digital transformation — SLB's DELFI digital platform faces competition from technology companies (Microsoft, AWS, Google Cloud) building E&P analytics capabilities; maintaining technology leadership requires continuous R&D investment
- →North America shale activity is highly sensitive to oil prices — HAL's large North America completion services exposure means its revenue and margins are heavily impacted by U.S. shale E&P capital spending, which can fall 30-50% in oil price downturns
- →Pressure pumping commoditization — hydraulic fracturing equipment is manufactured by multiple suppliers; overcapacity in the frac market during downturns compresses pricing and margins as operators play service companies against each other
- →International completion services build-out execution — Halliburton is attempting to replicate its North America completion services dominance internationally; this requires adapting services to different rock types and regulatory environments in markets where SLB has stronger entrenched relationships
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.