CPRI vs TPR Stock Comparison: AI Score, Valuation, Performance and Upside
CPRI (Capri Holdings) and TPR (Tapestry) are both multi-brand accessible luxury fashion companies — Capri with the sprawling Versace/Jimmy Choo/Michael Kors portfolio and Tapestry with Coach/Kate Spade/Stuart Weitzman. Both operate in the competitive accessible luxury handbag market but with different brand compositions, strategic trajectories, and profitability profiles — and a terminated merger between the two companies.
CPRI vs TPR is the two major U.S. multi-brand accessible luxury holding companies — Capri's luxury brand building ambition (Versace, Jimmy Choo) balanced on a Michael Kors revenue base versus Tapestry's Coach-led accessible luxury machine with superior cash generation.
CPRI and TPR are closely matched — they split the tracked metrics evenly. TPR has delivered stronger 1-year price return (+73.39% vs +18.90%), though CPRI trades at the lower forward P/E (7.86x vs 19.04x). Analyst consensus implies meaningfully more upside for CPRI (+26.57%) than for TPR (+11.57%).
- →Want exposure to a multi-brand portfolio spanning from accessible luxury (Michael Kors) to genuine luxury (Versace, Jimmy Choo)
- →Value the potential upside if Versace brand building succeeds in growing a true luxury brand to meaningful profitability
- →See Capri's valuation discount to Tapestry as a value opportunity given Michael Kors' market position and the portfolio's combined brand equity
- →Want the Coach brand as the dominant accessible luxury handbag company in North America with proven brand reinvention and strong free cash flow
- →Value Tapestry's capital return program and higher operating margins versus Capri's more complex portfolio with expensive luxury brand building
- →See China market recovery as a significant revenue growth catalyst for Coach's historically popular brand with Chinese consumers
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| AI score | 25.2 | 56.1 |
| AI rank | #2855 | #240 |
| Latest close | $20.32 | $143.50 |
| 1M return | +18.83% | +9.02% |
| 6M return | -19.56% | +17.44% |
| 1Y return | +18.90% | +73.39% |
How much would $10,000 be worth today if invested at the start of each period, with all dividends reinvested?
| Period | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| 1Y ago | $11.89K (+18.9%) started 2025-06-18 | $17.03K (+70.3%) started 2025-06-18 |
| 5Y ago | $3.89K (-61.1%) started 2021-06-18 | $42.86K (+328.6%) started 2021-06-21 |
| 10Y ago | $4.06K (-59.4%) started 2016-06-20 | $62.93K (+529.3%) started 2016-06-20 |
Hypothetical — past performance does not guarantee future results.
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.34B | $29.79B |
| Trailing P/E | 31.26 | 45.08 |
| Forward P/E | 7.86 | 19.04 |
| Price/Sales | 0.67 | 2.38 |
| EV/Revenue | 1.06 | 4.16 |
| Analyst target | $25.72 | $164.47 |
| Target upside | +26.57% | +11.57% |
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | -3.70% | 21.20% |
| Earnings growth | N/A | 73.70% |
| EPS growth | N/A | +73.70% |
| FCF margin | +5.20% | +19.49% |
| Operating margin | N/A | 22.41% |
| Profit margin | 3.94% | 8.44% |
| ROIC proxy | 35.09% | 60.91% |
| Return on equity | 35.09% | 60.91% |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Beta | 1.40 | 1.45 |
| Debt/equity | 1690.48 | 574.91 |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 1.84 |
| Quick ratio | 0.46 | 1.11 |
Lower drawdown and smaller single-period drops generally indicate a smoother ride, though they do not guarantee lower future risk.
| Period | Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | Growth | +18.90% | +70.35% |
| CAGR | +18.91% | +70.48% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.51 | 1.42 | |
| Max drawdown | 39.30% | 19.42% | |
| Max daily drop | 13.22% | 15.71% | |
| Max wkly drop | 15.95% | 12.91% | |
| 5Y | Growth | -61.12% | +280.86% |
| CAGR | -17.22% | +30.72% | |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.09 | 0.76 | |
| Max drawdown | 82.36% | 41.87% | |
| Max daily drop | 48.89% | 15.93% | |
| Max wkly drop | 53.46% | 20.99% | |
| 10Y | Growth | -59.39% | +370.83% |
| CAGR | -8.62% | +16.77% | |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.07 | 0.47 | |
| Max drawdown | 90.03% | 78.87% | |
| Max daily drop | 48.89% | 29.27% | |
| Max wkly drop | 60.95% | 37.71% |
| Category | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Capri Holdings Limited | Tapestry, Inc. |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary - Accessible Luxury Fashion | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | N/A | Luxury Goods |
| Core business | Capri Holdings is a global fashion luxury group with three brands: Versace (Italian luxury fashion house), Jimmy Choo (British luxury footwear and accessories), and Michael Kors (accessible luxury American handbags, apparel, and accessories) — seeking to build a portfolio spanning luxury to accessible luxury price points. | Tapestry is a New York-based house of modern luxury lifestyle brands including Coach (accessible luxury leather goods and accessories), Kate Spade (colorful, modern women's accessories), and Stuart Weitzman (premium women's footwear) — primarily serving the accessible luxury handbag and accessories market. |
| Investor focus | Investors track Capri's brand revenue trends (Michael Kors, Versace, Jimmy Choo individually), Michael Kors' North American performance (the primary revenue driver), Versace's luxury brand building progress, and capital allocation across three brands at very different stages of development. | Investors track Tapestry's Coach brand health (the primary revenue and profit driver), Kate Spade revenue trends, China market recovery, DTC penetration versus wholesale, and capital return through buybacks and dividends. |
- →Versace acquisition provides genuine ultra-luxury brand credentials to balance Michael Kors' accessible luxury positioning
- →Jimmy Choo's footwear focus differentiates the portfolio with a brand known globally for aspirational women's shoes
- →Multi-brand portfolio allows targeting different consumer segments and price points within the broader luxury accessories market
- →Coach is the leading accessible luxury handbag brand in North America with strong consumer recognition, retail network, and brand reinvention after a successful premium repositioning under creative director Stuart Vevers
- →China market recovery represents a significant revenue growth opportunity — Coach has historically been popular with Chinese consumers before COVID-era disruptions
- →Strong free cash flow generation and capital return — Tapestry consistently returns capital through buybacks given Coach's high-margin business model
- →Michael Kors remains approximately 70%+ of Capri revenues — the accessible luxury handbag market faces significant competition from Coach (Tapestry) and trading up to true luxury (Louis Vuitton)
- →Versace brand building requires sustained investment while generating limited profits relative to revenue — the timeline to profitability at scale is long
- →Tapestry attempted to acquire Capri Holdings in 2023, but the deal was blocked by the FTC — the failed merger created strategic uncertainty for Capri
- →Kate Spade has struggled to find consistent brand direction — revenue has been lumpy and the brand strategy less clearly articulated than Coach's successful repositioning
- →Accessible luxury handbags face competitive pressure from both true luxury brands (aspirational upgrade) and fast fashion alternatives (value-conscious trade-down)
- →The failed Capri acquisition attempt created legal and strategic overhang — Tapestry's future M&A strategy is unclear after the FTC blocked the deal
Want deeper AI forecasts?
This comparison page is public and free forever. Subscribers can unlock saved watchlists, full AI rankings, detailed forecasts, and interactive analysis tools.